Laserfiche WebLink
Background <br />•Problem Identification <br />•Design Review and noticing processes adopted over 30 years <br />ago <br />•Process is cumbersome and lengthy <br />•Design Review applicability is far-reaching <br />•Large notice radii exceeding Government Code requirements <br />•Long appeal periods exceeding neighboring jurisdictions <br />•Consistency with Plans <br />•City Council budget discussions <br />•City Council Prioritization Category 1 <br />•ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan <br />•Economic Development Strategic Plan <br />•Housing Element Goal 4 <br />3 <br />Key Areas <br />•Project Noticing | PMC Chapter 18.12: <br />•Modifying the public notice radius to align with the Government Code, amending mailed project <br />notification requirements, codifying on-site project notifications, and clarifying noticing <br />procedures. <br />•Repeal CC Resolution No. 91-132 <br />•Design Review | PMC Chapter 18.20: <br />•Modifying the projects subject to Design Review, adding Design Review findings, and clarifying <br />Design Review procedures. <br />•Appeals | PMC Chapter 18.144: <br />•Modifying the appeal period and clarifying appeal procedures. <br />•Other amendments throughout PMC Title 18 to align with the comprehensive overhauls <br />noted above and clean up changes <br />4 <br />Page 181 of 200