Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 9 <br />For asset groups with minimal existing location data—such as park assets and street <br />signage—the consultant performed full field collection, using GPS to locate items like signs, <br />trash cans, and benches, and recording photographic condition information. For asset groups <br />with partial GIS information, including curb ramps, sound walls, and trails, field work refined the <br />existing locations and added material and condition details. Asset groups that do not require <br />GIS mapping, such as fleet and buildings, were assessed in the field for condition and <br />photographed, with updates to be incorporated into the City's MaintStar (asset and <br />maintenance software) system. All collected assets are being updated with lifecycle <br />information, replacement costs, and risk assessments for Phase 3 prioritization and long-term <br />planning. <br /> <br />Some asset categories relied more heavily on existing data sources. For example, the <br />StreetSaver pavement management system already includes street segments with condition, <br />lifecycle, and risk details. These datasets are being integrated to consolidate all City asset <br />information in one location. The StreetSaver data was validated and will apply similar lifecycle <br />and risk methodologies to newly collected data for parking lots, City-owned roadways, and <br />utility infrastructure not previously included in StreetSaver. Tree inventory data collected by the <br />City’s tree maintenance contractor and reviewed by staff was also added as another example <br />of a more complete dataset. <br /> <br />Two asset groups were incorporated using existing GIS data only, with further assessments <br />scheduled under other City programs. Sidewalk segment condition, replacement cost, and risk <br />scoring will be completed through the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan <br />field review. Stormwater underground assets will be updated through the Stormwater <br />Management Plan. Both datasets will be integrated into the AMP upon completion of those <br />additional components. <br /> <br />For the City’s enterprise utilities, a combination of field observations, existing tools, and current <br />master plan data is used. Field efforts focused on above-ground assets, including pump <br />stations, their associated sites, buildings, generators, pumps, and valves. Underground assets, <br />including pipelines and maintenance holes, were incorporated using existing GIS data. The <br />utility divisions provided information and perspective to develop lifecycle and risk metrics for <br />the collected assets. Replacement and financial projections for water, recycled water, and <br />sewer systems were developed using information from the utilities’ management plans and 20- <br />Year Capital Improvement Plans. <br /> <br />State of Infrastructure <br />The report classified assets based on condition. <br /> <br />Condition <br />Rating Definition / Interpretation <br />Excellent The asset is new or nearly new — effectively at the start of its expected life cycle. It <br />performs as designed, with no observable deterioration, and requires no <br />maintenance beyond standard inspections. <br />Very <br />Good <br />The asset is functioning like new, with all systems operating within normal <br />parameters. There is no functional decline, and maintenance needs are minimal <br />and routine. <br />Good The asset continues to meet functional needs but shows early signs of wear or <br />Page 336 of 373