Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br />To support this effort, assets were organized into a hierarchy of ten major categories aligned <br />with departments and functional asset classes: <br />1. Utilities <br />2. Fleet <br />3. Callippe Golf <br />4. Facilities <br />5. Parks <br />6. Trails <br />7. Roadway <br />8. Pioneer Cemetery <br />9. Public Art <br />10. Urban Forestry. <br /> <br />Each major category was further subdivided to reflect how assets support City services. For <br />example: <br />• Utilities are grouped under one hierarchical category and then further divided by utility <br />type, including water, recycled water, sewer, and stormwater. Each utility system <br />includes both underground assets (pipelines, valves, maintenance holes) and above- <br />ground assets (buildings, pumps, equipment). <br />• Fleet is organized as a single category with subcategories for each department (e.g., <br />sewer, streets, water, police), reflecting shared maintenance and lifecycle practices <br />across departments. <br />• Facilities include all City buildings, except enterprise, and are subdivided by service <br />type—civic center, police, fire, recreation, operations, parks, and vehicle charging. Each <br />building is further broken down into major components, including the building shell, <br />mechanical systems, electrical systems, safety components, and site improvements. <br />Within each component, individual assets include elements such as windows, doors, <br />equipment, and systems. Interior building assets are cataloged by floor and room, <br />including finishes such as carpet, ceilings, and lighting. While doors are included as <br />assets, their individual hardware components are not listed separately because they fall <br />under the category of routine maintenance. Door hardware is replaced as part of the <br />door’s overall lifecycle replacement. <br /> <br />Phase 1 established the foundational asset hierarchy and level-of-service and life cycle <br />framework, which guides data collection, life cycle cost analysis, and prioritization in <br />subsequent phases of the AMP. <br /> <br />Phase 2 Summary <br />Phase 2 of the AMP focused on completing the asset inventory, conducting high-level <br />condition assessments, and developing estimated replacement costs. Asset information was <br />collected through field observations and by leveraging existing City tools and datasets. <br />Replacement cost estimates were developed using industry averages, existing City data, <br />current master plans, and discussions with operating departments. <br /> <br />Page 335 of 373