My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />of agricultural uses for both Sites 14 (St. Elizabeth Seton) and 26 (St. <br />Augustine). <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that, because none of the <br />other potential sites for rezoning are zoned for agricultural uses, the Housing <br />Element Update would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses <br />on those sites. Therefore, the impacts are less than significant with respect to <br />conflicts with existing zoning for agricultural use. <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that none of the potential sites <br />for rezoning are encumbered by a Williamson Act Contract, which precludes <br />an impact related to conflict with an existing Williamson Act Contract. <br />Therefore, there is no impact. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The project site is zoned PUD – Elementary School and is consistent with the <br />type of development anticipated for the site by the City under the approved <br />HEO. As the site is zoned for development of an elementary school and is <br />currently anticipated for residential development, the project site is not <br />zoned for or anticipated for agricultural uses. In addition, the project site is <br />not under a Williamson Act Contract.4 As such, the proposed project would <br />not result in any peculiar effects, and the criteria for requiring further CEQA <br />review are not met. <br />c, d) Conflict with Existing Forest Land Zoning and Conversion of Forest Land to Non- <br />Forest Use <br />Would the project: c) Conflict with existing zoning for forest land or timberland zoned <br />Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code <br />Section 51104(g))? or <br /> d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to <br />non-forest use? <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update EIR indicated that none of the potential sites for <br />rezoning contain any forest land or timberland, as defined by Public <br />Resource Code Section 4526, nor do they contain any timberland zoned <br />Timberland Production, as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g), <br />and concluded that this precludes the possibility of the Housing Element <br /> <br />4 California Department of Conservation. California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder. Available at: <br />https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/WilliamsonAct/App/index.html. Accessed December <br />2024.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.