My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />Update to conflict with forest zoning of forest land or timberland. No impact <br />would occur. <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR further indicated that, aside from Site 1 <br />(Lester), the potential sites for rezoning are adjacent to urbanized land uses <br />and do not contain any forest land. Site 1 (Lester) is surrounded to the <br />northwest, west, and southwest by open space. However, that land is outside <br />of the Urban Growth Boundary, and development would not be allowed in <br />those areas even with the approval of the Housing Element Update. The <br />Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that this condition precludes the <br />possibility of the development consistent with the Housing Element Update <br />converting forest land to non-forest use and concluded no impacts would <br />occur. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />Woodlands are not located on the project site and the project site is not <br />considered forest land or timberland. The proposed project is zoned PUD – <br />Elementary School and is anticipated for residential development by the <br />City; therefore, the site is not zoned Timberland Production. As such, the <br />proposed project would not result in any peculiar effects, and the criteria for <br />requiring further CEQA review are not met. <br />Conclusion <br />With regards to Agriculture and Forestry Resources, the consistency checklist <br />demonstrates that: <br />1. No peculiar impacts related to the proposed project or its site have <br />been identified. <br />2. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts <br />which were not discussed by the Housing Element Update FEIR. <br />3. No substantial new information has been identified which results in an <br />impact which is more severe than anticipated by the Housing Element <br />Update FEIR. <br />4. No mitigation measures would be required because the proposed <br />project’s specific impacts would be less than significant. <br /> <br />Mitigation Measures <br />None.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.