Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. PC-2025-13 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN <br />EDUCATION-BASED CERAMICS STUDIO LOCATED AT 1061 SERPENTINE LANE, <br />SUITE G, AS FILED UNDER CASE NO. P25-0227 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on May 5, 2025, Peter Kuo, on behalf of the ceramics studio, applied for a <br />Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) to operate an education-based ceramics studio (art school) <br />with a maximum of 30 people on-site at any one time within an existing building located at <br />1061 Serpentine Lane, Suite G (hereinafter “the Project”); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the subject property has a General Plan land use designation of General <br />and Limited Industrial; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned PUD-I (Planned Unit Development – <br />Industrial) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, an education-based ceramics studio (art school) is a conditionally <br />permitted use in the subject zoning district and requires Planning Commission approval of a <br />CUP; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on July 9, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public <br />hearing to consider the Project, all public comments and testimony, and findings. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission of the City of <br />Pleasanton, does resolve, declare, determine, and order the following: <br /> <br />Section 1: Findings for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) <br />With respect to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds the project is categorically exempt from <br />CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities. The proposed <br />use is for the operation of an education-based ceramics studio (art school) completely within <br />an existing building zoned for the proposed use and there is no expansion of use. The <br />proposed use does not involve the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances, all <br />necessary public services and facilities are available, and the surrounding area is not <br />environmentally sensitive. Therefore, no additional environmental review is required. <br /> <br />Section 2: Prior to acting on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the Planning <br />Commission reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project <br />and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project <br />(collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The Planning Commission’s determination is based on <br />the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference . <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A