My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />However, it is possible that parts of the City are also underlain by older <br />Quaternary deposits that are known to contain vertebrate fossils. Therefore, <br />the City has moderate paleontological sensitivity. <br />While shallow excavation or grading is unlikely to uncover paleontological <br />resources, deeper excavation into older sediments may uncover significant <br />fossils. Therefore, any project involving earthmoving activity could potentially <br />result in inadvertent discovery and disturbance of paleontological resources <br />during grading and excavation work. As such, construction-related and <br />earth-disturbing actions from development consistent with the Housing <br />Element Update on sites underlain by older Quaternary deposits have the <br />potential to damage or destroy fossils resulting in significant impacts on <br />paleontological resources. <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that compliance with federal <br />and State laws that protect paleontological resources, including Section <br />5097 of the Public Resources Code, as well as implementation of MM GEO-6, <br />which requires a site-specific paleontological resources survey to determine <br />potential paleontological impacts, would reduce potential impacts to <br />paleontological resources to less than significant. Should a site-specific <br />paleontological resources survey determine that a site is underlain by older <br />Quaternary deposits or any other soil with the potential to contain vertebrate <br />fossils, MM GEO-6 requires paleontological monitoring of all proposed <br />excavations. As such, impacts related to destruction of a paleontological <br />resource or unique geologic feature would be less than significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />Paleontological resources or fossils are the remains of prehistoric plant and <br />animal life. The soil types at the project site are not considered unique <br />geologic features and are common within the geographic area of the City. <br />Based on the above, the project site does not contain any peculiar <br />conditions that would result in increased potential for subsurface <br />paleontological resources. In addition, the proposed project would be <br />required to comply with all applicable federal, State, and local requirements <br />to avoid potential adverse effects to paleontological resources if such <br />resources are discovered during ground-disturbing activities on the site. <br />Therefore, impacts related to resulting in the direct or indirect destruction of a <br />unique paleontological resource were adequately addressed in the Housing <br />Element Update FEIR, and the proposed project would not result in any <br />effects that would require further CEQA review for this topic.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.