Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />96 <br /> <br />natural gas infrastructure on-site. Furthermore, the proposed project would <br />incorporate green stormwater infrastructure and water-efficiency measures <br />to promote water conservation in compliance with Secondary Action 8 and <br />PA 15 of the CAP 2.0, respectively. Because the proposed project is <br />implementing all requirements discussed in the Compliance Checklist, the <br />proposed project would be considered consistent with the City’s CAP 2.0. <br />Based on the above, implementation of the proposed project would result in <br />the emission of GHGs, but the proposed project would comply with the <br />applicable measures included in the City’s CAP 2.0, which would ensure that <br />the proposed project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or <br />indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, or conflict <br />with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of <br />reducing the emissions of GHGs. Because the proposed project would not be <br />considered to conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted <br />for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, the proposed project <br />would not result in any peculiar effects related to the generation of GHG <br />emissions, and requirements for additional CEQA review are not met. <br />Conclusion <br />With regards to Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the consistency checklist <br />demonstrates that: <br />1. No peculiar impacts related to the proposed project or its site have <br />been identified. <br />2. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts <br />which were not discussed by the Housing Element Update FEIR. <br />3. No substantial new information has been identified which results in an <br />impact which is more severe than anticipated by the Housing Element <br />Update FEIR. <br />4. No mitigation measures would be required because the proposed <br />project’s specific impacts would be less than significant. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />None.