Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />116 <br /> <br />compliance the General Plan contains policies and programs that would <br />facilitate groundwater recharge by encouraging pervious surfaces in new <br />developments and requiring projects to meet federal, State, regional, and <br />local stormwater requirements, including stormwater infiltration. Therefore, <br />implementation of the Housing Element Update would not conflict with or <br />obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable <br />groundwater management plan and impacts would be less than significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />Water supplies for the City are managed by Zone 7 of the Alameda County <br />Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Zone 7 Water Agency). <br />Approximately 75 percent of the water supplied by the Zone 7 Water Agency <br />acquires more than 80 percent of its raw water supply from the California <br />State Water Project (SWP), a multi-purpose water storage and delivery system <br />comprised of canals, pipelines, reservoirs, and hydroelectric power facilities <br />that extends more than 705 miles. SWP surface water is treated at the <br />Patterson Pass Water Treatment Plant (PPWTP) and the Del Valle Water <br />Treatment Plant (DVWTP) and is conveyed through a network of Zone 7 <br />Water Agency transmission pipelines to the City’s service areas and other <br />retail customers. <br />Although the proposed project would have the potential to result in an <br />increase in population, the proposed project would be consistent with the <br />type of residential development anticipated for the project site by the City. <br />Therefore, the potential increase in water demand has been <br />accommodated for within the previous analysis. In addition, the project site <br />represents a relatively small area compared to the overall surface area of <br />the San Francisco Bay Basin. Runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces <br />would be directed to the on-site stormwater drainage management facilities <br />and ultimately into the City’s storm drain system. At both locations, runoff <br />water would percolate and recharge the San Francisco Bay Basin. Therefore, <br />any new impervious surfaces associated with the proposed project would not <br />interfere substantially with groundwater recharge within the San Francisco <br />Bay Basin. <br />As discussed in further detail in Section XVIII, Utilities and Service Systems, the <br />proposed project would not result in substantial adverse effects related to <br />groundwater use or water supply. Thus, impacts related to substantially <br />decreasing groundwater supplies or interfering substantially with <br />groundwater recharge were adequately addressed in the Housing Element