My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />126 <br /> <br />consistent with the Pleasanton Zoning Ordinance. Moreover, as the City <br />receives development applications for subsequent development consistent <br />with the Housing Element Update, those applications would be reviewed by <br />the City for compliance with the goals, policies, and programs of the <br />Municipal Code. As such, if approved, the proposed rezonings would serve <br />as a self-mitigating aspect of the project that would serve to correct conflicts <br />that would otherwise exist, and impacts would be less than significant. <br />Annexation <br />All the potential sites for housing are located within the incorporated area, <br />except for Site 1 (Lester) and Site 22 (Merritt). Site 22 (Merritt) is just outside of <br />the city limits, but within Pleasanton’s SOI and Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). <br />Site 1 (Lester) is also located just outside of the city limits, and its western half <br />is located just outside the UGB (see Exhibit 2-2 in the Housing Element Update <br />Draft EIR). Prior to development on those sites, they would need to be <br />annexed into the City of Pleasanton consistent with City and LAFCo policies <br />as well as Program 1.10 of the Housing Element. Annexation of these two <br />properties would represent a logical and orderly extension of urban growth <br />and the City’s boundaries which would ensure the two properties would be <br />developed in a comprehensive and thoughtful manner consistent with other <br />nearby lands. Moreover, as the City receives development applications <br />consistent with the Housing Element Update for these two sites, those <br />applications would be reviewed by the City for compliance with the goals, <br />policies, and programs of the General Plan and Municipal Code. <br />Furthermore, LAFCo would review the development applications for these <br />sites to ensure consistency with LAFCo policies, and impacts would be less <br />than significant. <br />Urban Growth Boundary (Measure FF) <br />All the potential sites for housing are within the Urban Growth Boundary apart <br />from western half of Site 1 (Lester), and no development would be allowed <br />on the portion of that site outside of the UGB. Therefore, impacts would be <br />less than significant. <br />City of Pleasanton Measures PP and QQ <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that, consistent with General <br />Plan, individual development projects would be required to undergo project- <br />specific discretionary environmental review with respect to annexation and <br />development in the City of Pleasanton, including additional analysis to <br />determine consistency with Measure PP. Therefore, development consistent
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.