Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />127 <br /> <br />with the Housing Element Update would not conflict with Measures PP or QQ, <br />and impacts would be less than significant. <br />Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated the Livermore Municipal Airport is <br />located approximately 1 mile east of the City of Pleasanton, and some areas <br />of the City are within the flight path for planes taking off and arriving at the <br />Livermore Airport. As shown in Exhibit 3.8-2 in the Housing Element Update <br />Draft EIR, Site 12 (Pimlico Area, North side), Site 14 (St. Elizabeth Seton), Site 15 <br />(Rheem Drive Area, southwest side), Site 21a and 21b (Kiewit) are located <br />within the Alameda County ALUPP AIA, which is coterminous with the <br />Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission Hazard Prevention Zone. <br />None of the potential sites for housing are within an Airport Protection Area. <br />Developments within the ALUPP’s AIA would be required to undergo federal, <br />State, and local regulatory review processes specific to airport noise, <br />airspace safety, and other land use compatibility standards, including 14 <br />Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 regulations for the safety, efficient use, <br />and preservation of navigable airspaces. In reviewing individual applications, <br />The City would determine which policies and actions apply and whether <br />project modifications would be required to ensure compatibility with the <br />Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). Buildings within the ALUCP AIA <br />would be required to comply with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) <br />regulations for height. Therefore, development consistent with the Housing <br />Element Update would be consistent with the Alameda County ALUCP and <br />impacts would be less than significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />As discussed throughout this Consistency Checklist, the proposed project <br />would be consistent with the type of residential development anticipated for <br />the site by the City. In addition, as demonstrated by this Checklist, the <br />proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental <br />effects that were not previously identified in the Housing Element Update FEIR <br />and could not be substantially mitigated by uniformly applicable <br />development policies and standards, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15183. The proposed project would not conflict with City policies and <br />regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />environmental effect, including, but not limited to, the City’s noise standards, <br />applicable regulations related to stormwater, and development standards <br />included in the Pleasanton Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed project <br />would not cause a significant environmental impact in excess of what has