Laserfiche WebLink
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT <br />4400 Black Ave <br /> 5 <br />BACKGROUND <br />ENVIRONMENT <br />During the early historic era, the project area was at the border of a seasonal wetland called the <br />Pleasanton Marsh complex to the north and drier grassland to the south. The Pleasanton Marsh <br />complex was one of the Bay Area’s largest freshwater, non-tidal wetlands. It consisted of a variety of <br />intermixed wetland types, which included “many springs and supported a large area of open water, <br />seasonal wetlands, and extensive willow thickets and freshwater marshlands” (Standford et al. 2013: <br />79). In the project area, the wetlands were composed of wet meadow in the north-northeast and willow <br />thicket (swamp) along the western boundary. The Arroyo del Valle Creek, one of the main <br />contributors to the marsh complex, flowed 600 feet southwest of the project area through the marsh <br />(Thompson and West 1878; Stanford et al. 2013). The grassland was part of a large, varied grassland <br />present in much of the Amador-Livermore Valley. In this part of the Bay Area, oaks were confined <br />mainly to the hillsides and riparian corridors due to soil conditions, and the valley bottom supported <br />a variety of grasses and flowers encouraged by Ohlone land management practices (Stanford et al. <br />2013: 76-78) <br />PREHISTORY <br />Some of the first significant archaeological work in the San Francisco Bay Area was conducted early <br />in the 20th century when N.C. Nelson recorded and/or excavated over 400 bayside shell mounds <br />(Nelson 1909; Moratto 1984). Data from these excavations and successive projects in the San <br />Francisco Bay, San Joaquin/Sacramento River Delta, and inland sites illuminated regional <br />archaeological sequences and allowed the development of the Central California Taxonomic System <br />(CCTS). The CCTS outlines three main chronological periods (or ‘horizons’) for the Sacramento Delta <br />and San Francisco Bay areas – Early, Middle, and Late, mostly based on evidence from mortuary <br />practices and analysis of stylistic change in burial-associated artifacts. We summarize the Early, Middle, <br />and Late Periods, with the transitions between them, following Hylkema’s (2002) and Milliken et al.’s <br />(2007) approaches. <br />The Early-Middle-Late sequence focuses on the Late Holocene period (after 2000 BCE), since little <br />archaeological information from the Early Holocene is known from the San Francisco Bay Area. In <br />other parts of California, the Early Holocene (8000-3500 BCE) is characterized by mobile foragers <br />using wide-stemmed and leaf-shaped projectile points and large milling slabs (Milliken et al. 2007:114). <br />Given the rise in sea levels in the Middle Holocene, the relatively recent formation of San Francisco <br />Bay, and the presence of constant alluviation in the low-lying areas of the Bay Area, most evidence of <br />the earliest human habitation in the area is likely to be underwater or deeply buried. For the Early <br />Holocene period, therefore, most evidence comes from inland sites: deposits dating from ca. 8000 <br />BCE and burials dating from 5500-5000 BCE were discovered around Los Vaqueros Reservoir in <br />eastern Contra Costa County (Meyer and Rosenthal 1997), and deep deposits from the Metcalf Creek <br />site (CA-SCl-178) in Morgan Hill yielded radiocarbon dates of 8000-6500 years BCE (Hildebrandt <br />1983; Milliken et al. 2007:114; Jones et al. 2007:130).