My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Supplemental Materials 11-12-25 (2)
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
11-12
>
Planning Commission Supplemental Materials 11-12-25 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 4:54:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 4:39:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
866
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT <br />4400 Black Ave <br /> 30 <br />4. the resource has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or <br />history of the State or the nation (criterion 4 applies primarily to archaeological sites <br />and not historic buildings). <br />B. the resource retains historic integrity; and, <br />C. it is 50 years old or older (except for rare cases of structures of exceptional significance). <br />CRHR SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION <br />Our research did not reveal any important events or patterns of history associated with 4400 Black <br />Ave. The property is associated with themes of commercial development in Pleasanton and <br />telecommunications in the larger East Bay region, however it was not significant in the context of <br />either of these patterns. The building at 4400 Black Ave, therefore, appears to be not eligible under <br />CRHR Criterion 1. <br />No individuals associated with the call center at 4400 Black Ave appear to have achieved significance <br />in the history of California or the nation. The property, therefore, appears to be not eligible under <br />CRHR Criterion 2. <br />Architecturally, the best part of this building is the walled garden. The square wooden posts in this <br />area, the garden walls, and the trellis-like beams form a pleasing composition, one that relates visually <br />to nearby features, namely the posts that support the roof over the entrance area and to the pilasters <br />in the building’s front wall. These features, however, form only a small part of the overall building <br />and, for that matter, only a small part of the front of the building as viewed from the front parking <br />lot. With the exception of the clay tiles at the roof perimeter, the rest of the building seems to be built <br />of inexpensive materials and the design seems unexceptional. The different wall areas – of plaster and <br />of diagonal boards – do not relate very well to each other and do not seem to be arranged according <br />to an ordered plan. The clay tiles at the roof harken to Spanish California and to the Mediterranean <br />and Spanish Colonial Revival styles that were common in the state during the 1920s-1930s, and they <br />seem out of place in this modern building. These clay roof tiles also do not relate well visually to the <br />plaster soffit of the broad roof overhang. Overall, the design of this building seems to lack distinction. <br />There is a larger design issue to consider as well. The building is set far back from the street behind a <br />large parking lot. Such placement of buildings was common in suburban areas during the 1970s, but <br />placing a building behind a large parking area makes it subordinate, visually, to the parking. In this <br />case, it is all but invisible from the public right-of-way (Black Avenue). Furthermore, the architect J. <br />Jack Bras’s was not a “master”; research indicates that his work was unexceptional and was not <br />recognized in the field of architecture. For these reasons, this property does not appear to be eligible <br />for the California Register under Criterion 3. <br />Criterion 4 is usually used to evaluate archaeological sites. In some cases, a built environment resource <br />may contain useful information about construction techniques or the use of materials by builders. <br />However, 4400 Black Avenue was constructed using materials and techniques that were typical of its <br />period. Therefore, the property does not appear to be eligible under CRHR Criterion 4. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.