My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 3-17-26 (3)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
031726 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 3-17-26 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2026 2:57:48 PM
Creation date
3/11/2026 2:56:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/17/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 of 5 <br />City to cover future pension costs and provide a buffer for unexpected spikes in pension <br />contributions due to CalPERS investment losses or changes in actuarial assumptions. <br /> <br />While considering the use of pension trust funds (one-time resources) to balance the budget, <br />the City should take a balanced approach that accounts for significant needs in other areas— <br />particularly the $44.0 million annual infrastructure funding gap identified in the Asset <br />Management Plan. To maintain essential City services, the City should adopt a holistic <br />approach to support programs and fund serviceable community assets, such as the library, <br />public safety buildings, streets and roadways, and parks and trails. Establishing a clear vision <br />and implementing a long-term financial strategy will strengthen the City’s ability to sustain core <br />services and critical infrastructure while containing costs over time. <br /> <br />Table 1 Section 115 Trust Modeling Assumptions <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Table 2 Summary of Section 115 Pension Trust Smoothing Options <br /> <br /> <br />The City will review the pension funding policy periodically to determine whether changes are <br />necessary to ensure progress towards funding the City’s CalPERS pension costs and <br />Page 192 of 242
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.