My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 3-17-26 (3)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
031726 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 3-17-26 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2026 2:57:48 PM
Creation date
3/11/2026 2:56:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/17/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transfer of Regional Housing Needs Allocations and Credits – Merritt Property Annexation <br />Page 2 <br />March 17, 2026 <br /> <br /> <br />Summary of Merritt Property Land Use Designation/Zoning and County Methodology for <br />RHNA Transfer <br />The Merritt Property consists of four parcels totaling approximately 46.4 acres. The property is <br />not identified in the County’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Sites Inventory, and the County did not <br />anticipate residential development of these parcels during the current 6th Cycle Housing <br />Element cycle. While the existing County General Plan designation allows low-density <br />residential development of approximately one to four units per acre, there is no pending or <br />reasonably foreseeable development proposal for the site with the County. Furthermore, absent <br />the City providing municipal utilities, which could occur only with annexation, any residential <br />development would be required to be served by on-site water wells and septic systems, which <br />limit development capacity. <br /> <br />Conversely, the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element does include this site in its inventory (Area 22 <br />– Meritt Property) on the basis of 20 years of continued interest in annexing and developing the <br />property, including an application submitted in 2022 for a 111-unit age-restricted project. The <br />Housing Element conservatively assumed a total of 90 units of market-rate (above-moderate) <br />housing. The 111-unit project, including 92 market-rate units, 18 deed-restricted moderate- <br />income units, and the retention of one existing unit (a second existing unit would be demolished <br />as part of the project), was approved by the City on July 16, 2024. An annexation application <br />was submitted to LAFCo on July 16, 2024, and approved on February 4, 2026. <br /> <br />Accordingly, the County and the City propose that the RHNA transfer associated with the Merritt <br />Property annexation be based on the property's current as-zoned development capacity within <br />the unincorporated area of the County. The parcels presently allow limited residential uses by <br />right, including agricultural caretaker units and accessory dwelling units (ADUs). <br /> <br />Under the current County zoning, the four parcels collectively allow up to 20 residential units by <br />right, of which two units currently exist. This results in a net potential of 18 additional units. The <br />County and the City, therefore, propose a corresponding reduction of 18 units from the County’s <br />RHNA obligation, with the City receiving RHNA credit for any residential units ultimately <br />constructed on the Merritt Property following annexation. <br /> <br />Income Category Determination <br />Given the extremely low potential density of development at this location, the County and City <br />agree that the appropriate RHNA income designation for any future units constructed under <br />County jurisdiction is Above-Moderate-Income. With a maximum theoretical buildout of 20 units <br />across approximately 45.6 acres, the resulting density is approximately 0.44 units per acre, <br />including ADUs, and lower without ADUs. This density is consistent with rural and very low- <br />intensity residential development patterns and does not support consideration for lower-income <br />housing at this location. <br /> <br />Mutual RHNA Transfer Agreement <br />Through this letter, the County of Alameda and the City of Pleasanton agree and affirm their <br />mutual agreement that: <br />Page 56 of 242
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.