Laserfiche WebLink
REGIONAL GROUNDWATER FACILITIES PROJECT <br />FEASIBILITY STUDY <br /> <br /> 27 Zone 7 Water Agency <br />December, 2025 <br /> <br />Table 7. Pass/fail criteria (Water Production Capacity and Groundwater Basin Sustainability) do not <br />contribute numerically to the total score. <br />For each alternative i, and weighted criterion k, a raw score (1 to 10) is converted to Weighted Points <br />using the criterion’s weight expressed in point values (e.g., 15, 25). The Weighted Points were calculated <br />as follows: <br />π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘‘ π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘–π‘›π‘‘π‘ ΰ―œ,௞ ࡌ ΰ΅¬π‘…π‘Žπ‘€π‘†π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘’ΰ―œ,௞ <br />10 ΰ΅° ࡈ π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘%௞ <br />The Total Project Score for alternative i is the sum of the Weighted Points across the six weighted criteria: <br />π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘—π‘’π‘π‘‘ π‘†π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘’ΰ―œ ࡌ ෍ βˆ— <br />ΰ¬Ί <br />ΰ―žΰ­€ΰ¬΅ <br />ΰ΅¬π‘…π‘Žπ‘€π‘†π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘’ΰ―œ,௞ <br />10 ΰ΅° ࡈ π‘Šπ‘’π‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘%௞ <br />Where: <br />ο‚· i = project alternative, <br />ο‚· k = evaluation criterion, <br />ο‚· Raw Score = value from 1 to 10 assigned to the alternative for that criterion, <br />ο‚· Weight% = weighting (point value) agreed upon by Zone 7 and the City for that criterion <br /> <br />The maximum possible total score is 100 points, equal to the sum of the six weighted criteria, which <br />corresponds to a theoretical perfect score of 10 for each category. <br />4.2. Evaluation Results <br />The Total Project Score provides a transparent basis for comparing the relative performance of the <br />alternatives. Table 8 presents the scoring results for each project alternative across the six weighted criteria. <br /> Table 8. Project Evaluation Scoring Summary <br /> <br />Alternative 1 <br />(Tennis Park <br />Only) <br />Alternative 2 <br />(Tennis/Hanse <br />n Parks) <br />Alternative 3 <br />(Tennis/Del <br />Prado Parks) <br />Alternative 4 <br />(Tennis/Hansen/De <br />l Prado Parks) <br />Criteria Descriptions Ra <br />w <br /> <br />S <br />c <br />o <br />r <br />e <br /> <br />We <br />i <br />g <br />h <br />t <br />e <br />d <br /> <br />Po <br />i <br />n <br />t <br />s <br /> <br />Ra <br />w <br /> <br />S <br />c <br />o <br />r <br />e <br /> <br />We <br />i <br />g <br />h <br />t <br />e <br />d <br /> <br />Po <br />i <br />n <br />t <br />s <br /> <br />Ra <br />w <br /> <br />S <br />c <br />o <br />r <br />e <br /> <br />We <br />i <br />g <br />h <br />t <br />e <br />d <br /> <br />Po <br />i <br />n <br />t <br />s <br /> <br />Ra <br />w <br /> <br />S <br />c <br />o <br />r <br />e <br /> <br />We <br />i <br />g <br />h <br />t <br />e <br />d <br /> <br />Po <br />i <br />n <br />t <br />s <br /> <br />Operational Flexibility & <br />Resilience 3 4.5 6 9.0 5 7.5 9 13.5 <br />Capital Cost 8 20.0 6 15.0 7 17.5 4 10.0 <br />Water <br />Quality/Treatment <br />Impacts <br />8 8.0 7 7.0 8 8.0 7 7.0