Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-14 <br /> <br /> <br />STANDARD PROJECT REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />The project proponent would require a qualified RPF or biologist to conduct a <br />data review and reconnaissance-level survey prior to treatment, no more than <br />one year prior to the submittal of the PSA, and no more than one year between <br />completion of the PSA and implementation of the treatment project. The data <br />reviewed would include the biological resources setting, species and sensitive <br />natural communities tables, and habitat information in this PEIR for the <br />ecoregion(s) where the treatment would occur. It would also include review of <br />the best available, current data for the area, including vegetation mapping data, <br />species distribution/range information, the CNDDB, the CNPS Inventory of Rare <br />and Endangered Plants of California, relevant BIOS queries, and relevant general <br />and regional plans. Reconnaissance-level biological surveys would be general <br />surveys that include visual and auditory inspection for biological resources to <br />help determine the environmental setting of a Project site. The qualified surveyor <br />would identify and document sensitive resources, such as riparian or other <br />sensitive habitats, sensitive natural community, wetlands, or wildlife nursery site <br />or habitat (including bird nests) and assess the suitability of habitat for special- <br />status plant and animal species. The surveyor would also record any incidental <br />wildlife observations. For each treatment project, habitat assessments would be <br />completed at a time of year that is appropriate for identifying habitat and no <br />more than one year prior to the submittal of the PSA, unless it can be <br />demonstrated in the PSA that habitat assessments older than one year remain <br />valid (e.g., site conditions are unchanged, and no treatment activity has occurred <br />since the assessment). If more than one year passes between completion of the <br />PSA and initiation of the treatment project, the project proponent would verify <br />the continued accuracy of the PSA prior to beginning the treatment project by <br />reviewing for any data updates and/or visiting the site to verify conditions. Based <br />on the results of the data review and reconnaissance-level survey, the project <br />proponent, in consultation with a qualified RPF or biologist, would determine <br />which one of the following best characterizes the treatment: