My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-34 <br /> <br /> <br />STANDARD PROJECT REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />o Treatment activities would be implemented outside of the <br />buffer, the location of which would be determined by a <br />qualified RPF or biologist <br />o Factors to be considered for determining buffer location would <br />include presence of natural buffers provided by vegetation or <br />topography, nest height above ground, baseline levels of noise <br />and human activity, species sensitivity, and expected treatment <br />activities <br />o Nests of common birds within the buffer need not be <br />monitored during treatment; however, buffers would be <br />maintained until young fledge or the nest becomes inactive, as <br />determined by the qualified RPF, biologist, or biological <br />technician <br />• Modify Treatment: The project proponent would modify the treatment <br />in the vicinity of an active nest to avoid disturbance of active nests (e.g., <br />by implementing manual treatment methods, rather than mechanical <br />treatment methods) <br />o Treatment modifications would be determined by the project <br />proponent in coordination with the qualified RPF or biologist <br />• Defer Treatment: The project proponent would defer the timing of <br />treatment in the portion(s) of the treatment site that could disturb the <br />active nest <br />o If this avoidance strategy is implemented, treatment activity <br />would not commence until young fledge or the nest becomes <br />inactive, as determined by the qualified RPF, biologist, or <br />biological technician
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.