My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-35 <br /> <br /> <br />STANDARD PROJECT REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />Feasible actions would be taken by the project proponent to avoid loss of <br />common native bird nests. The feasibility of implementing the avoidance <br />strategies would be determined by the project proponent based on whether <br />implementation of this SPR would preclude completing the treatment project <br />within the reasonable period of time necessary to meet CalVTP program <br />objectives, including, but not limited to, protection of vulnerable communities. <br />Considerations may include limitations on the presence of environmental and <br />atmospheric conditions necessary to execute treatment prescriptions (e.g., the <br />limited seasonal windows during which prescribed burning can occur when <br />vegetation moisture, weather, wind, and other physical conditions are suitable). <br />If it is infeasible to avoid loss of common bird nests (not including raptor nests), <br />the project proponent would document the reasons implementation of the <br />avoidance strategies is infeasible in the PSA. After completion of the PSA and <br />prior to or during treatment implementation, if there is any change in the <br />feasibility of avoidance strategies from those explained in the PSA, this would be <br />documented in the post-project implementation report (referred to by CAL FIRE <br />as a Completion Report). <br />The following avoidance strategies may also be considered together with or in <br />lieu of other actions for implementation by a project proponent to avoid <br />disturbance to raptor nests: <br />• Monitor Active Raptor Nest During Treatment: A qualified RPF, <br />biologist, or biological technician would monitor an active raptor nest <br />during treatment activities to identify signs of agitation, nest defense, or <br />other behaviors that signal disturbance of the active nest is likely (e.g., <br />standing up from a brooding position, flying off the nest) <br />o If breeding raptors are showing signs of nest disturbance, one <br />of the other avoidance strategies (establish buffer, modify <br />treatment, or defer treatment) would be implemented or a <br />pause in the treatment activity would occur until the <br />disturbance behavior ceases
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.