My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-60 <br /> <br /> <br />MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />If listed plants are determined to be present through application of SPR BIO-1 and SPR <br />BIO-7, the project proponent would avoid and protect these species by establishing a no- <br />disturbance buffer around the area occupied by listed plants and marking the buffer <br />boundary with high-visibility flagging, fencing, stakes, or clear, existing landscape <br />demarcations (e.g., edge of a roadway). Exceptions to this requirement are listed later in <br />this measure. The no-disturbance buffers would generally be a minimum of 50 feet from <br />listed plants, but the size and shape of the buffer zone may be adjusted if a qualified RPF <br />or botanist determines that a smaller buffer would be sufficient to avoid killing or <br />damaging listed plants or that a larger buffer is necessary to sufficiently protect plants <br />from the treatment activity. The appropriate buffer size would be determined based on <br />plant phenology at the time of treatment (e.g., whether the plants are in a dormant, <br />vegetative, or flowering state), the individual species’ vulnerability to the treatment <br />method being used, and environmental conditions and terrain. For example, paint-on or <br />wicking application of herbicides to invasive plants may be implemented within 50 feet of <br />listed plant species without posing a risk, especially if the listed plants are dormant at the <br />time of application. Consideration of factors such as site hydrology, changes in light, edge <br />effects, and potential introduction of invasive plants and noxious weeds may inform the <br />determination of buffer width. If a no-disturbance buffer is reduced below 50 feet from a <br />listed plant, a qualified RPF or botanist would provide the project proponent with a site- <br />and/or treatment activity-specific explanation for the buffer reduction, which would be <br />included in the PSA. After completion of the PSA and prior to or during treatment <br />implementation, if there is any deviation (e.g., further reduction) from the reduced buffer <br />as explained in the PSA, this would be documented in the post-project implementation <br />report (referred to by CAL FIRE as a Completion Report) with a science-based justification <br />for the deviation. No fire ignition (nor use of associated accelerants) would occur within <br />50 feet of listed plants. <br />For species listed under ESA or CESA, if the project proponent cannot avoid loss by <br />implementing no-disturbance buffers, the project proponent would implement MM BIO- <br />1c.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.