My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-65 <br /> <br /> <br />MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />If significant impacts on listed or non-listed special-status plants cannot feasibly be <br />avoided as specified under the circumstances described under MMs BIO-1a and 1b, the <br />project proponent would prepare a Compensatory Mitigation Plan that identifies the <br />residual significant impacts that require compensatory mitigation and describes the <br />compensatory mitigation strategy being implemented and how unavoidable losses of <br />special-status plants would be compensated. The project proponent would consult with <br />CDFW and/or any other applicable responsible agency prior to finalizing the <br />Compensatory Mitigation Plan to satisfy that responsible agency’s requirements (e.g., <br />permits, approvals) within the plan. If the special-status plant taxa are listed under ESA or <br />CESA, the plan would be submitted to CDFW and/or USFWS (as appropriate) for review <br />and comment. <br />The first priority for compensatory mitigation would be preserving and enhancing existing <br />populations outside of the treatment area in perpetuity, or if that is not an option because <br />existing populations that can be preserved in perpetuity are not available, one of the <br />following mitigation options would be implemented by the project proponent instead: <br />• Creating populations on mitigation-sites outside of the treatment area through <br />seed collection and dispersal (annual species) or transplantation (perennial <br />species) <br />• Purchasing mitigation credits from a CDFW- or USFWS-approved conservation or <br />mitigation bank in sufficient quantities to offset the loss of occupied habitat <br />• If the affected special-status plants are not listed under ESA or CESA, <br />compensatory mitigation may include restoring or enhancing degraded habitats <br />so that they are made suitable to support special-status plant species in the <br />future <br />If relocation efforts are part of the Compensatory Mitigation Plan, the plan would include <br />details on the methods to be used, including collection, storage, propagation, receptor <br />site preparation, installation, long-term protection and management, monitoring and <br />reporting requirements, success criteria, and remedial action responsibilities should the <br />initial effort fail to meet long-term monitoring requirements. The following performance <br />standards would be applied for relocation: <br />Treatment <br />Maintenance: <br />N
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.