My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-66 <br /> <br /> <br />MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />• The extent of occupied area would be substantially similar to the affected <br />occupied habitat and would be suitable for self-producing populations <br />o Re-located/re-established populations would be considered suitable for <br />self-producing when: <br />▪ Habitat conditions allow for plants to reestablish annually for a <br />minimum of 5 years with no human intervention, such as <br />supplemental seeding; and <br />▪ Reestablished habitats contain an occupied area comparable to <br />existing occupied habitat areas in similar habitat types in the <br />region <br />If preservation of existing populations or creation of new populations is part of the <br />mitigation plan, the Compensatory Mitigation Plan would include a summary of the <br />proposed compensation lands and actions (e.g., the number and type of credits, location <br />of mitigation bank or easement, restoration or enhancement actions), parties responsible <br />for the long-term management of the land, and the legal and funding mechanisms (e.g., <br />holder of conservation easement or fee title). The project proponent would submit <br />evidence that the necessary mitigation has been implemented or that the project <br />proponent has entered into a legal agreement to implement it and that compensatory <br />plant populations would be preserved in perpetuity. <br />If mitigation includes dedication of conservation easements, purchase of mitigation <br />credits, or other off-site conservation measures, the details of these measures would be <br />included in the mitigation plan, including information on responsible parties for long-term <br />management, conservation easement holders, long-term management requirements, <br />funding assurances, and success criteria such as those listed above and other details, as <br />appropriate to target the preservation of long-term viable populations. <br />If mitigation includes restoring or enhancing habitat within the treatment area or outside <br />of the treatment area, the Compensatory Mitigation Plan would include a description of <br />the proposed habitat improvements, success criteria that demonstrate the performance <br />standard of maintained habitat function has been met, legal and funding mechanisms, <br />and parties responsible for long-term management and monitoring of the restored <br />habitat.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.