Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-68 <br /> <br /> <br />MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />which treatment could occur that would avoid mortality, injury, or disturbance of <br />the species. <br />a. For species listed under ESA or CESA, if the project proponent cannot <br />avoid mortality, injury, or disturbance by implementing one of the two <br />options listed above, the project proponent would implement MM BIO- <br />2c. <br />b. Injury or mortality of California Fully Protected Species is prohibited <br />pursuant to Sections 3511, 4700, 5050, and 5515 of the California Fish <br />and Game Code and would be avoided. <br />Maintain Habitat Function <br />The project proponent would design treatment activities to maintain the habitat function <br />by implementing the following: <br />• While performing review and surveys for SPR BIO-1 and SPR BIO-10, a qualified <br />RPF or biologist would identify any habitat features that are necessary for <br />survival (e.g., habitat necessary for breeding, foraging, shelter, movement) of the <br />affected wildlife species (e.g., trees with complex structure, trees with large <br />cavities, trees with nesting platforms; dens; tree snags; large raptor nests <br />[including inactive nests]; downed woody debris; food sources) <br />o These habitat features would be marked and treatments applied to the <br />features would be designed to minimize or avoid the loss or degradation <br />of suitable habitat for listed species during treatments <br />o Identification and treatment of these features would be based on the <br />life history and habitat requirements of the affected species and the <br />most current, commonly accepted science <br />• If it is determined during implementation of SPR BIO-1 and SPR BIO-10 that listed <br />or fully protected wildlife with specific requirements for high canopy cover (e.g., <br />Humboldt marten, fisher, spotted owl, coastal California gnatcatcher, riparian <br />woodrat) are present within a treatment area, then tree or shrub canopy cover <br />within existing suitable areas would be retained at the percentage preferred by <br />the species (as determined by expert opinion, published habitat association <br />information, or other documented standards that are commonly accepted [e.g.,