My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-79 <br /> <br /> <br />MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />CEQA after implementing feasible treatment design alternatives and <br />impact minimization measures, then MM BIO-2c would be implemented <br />The only exception to this mitigation approach is in cases where it is determined by a <br />qualified RPF or biologist that the non-listed special-status wildlife would benefit from <br />treatment in the occupied habitat area even though some of the non-listed special-status <br />wildlife may be killed, injured, or disturbed during treatment activities. For a treatment to <br />be considered beneficial to non-listed special-status wildlife, the qualified RPF or biologist <br />would demonstrate with substantial evidence that habitat function is reasonably expected <br />to improve with implementation of the treatment (e.g., by citing scientific studies <br />demonstrating that the species [or similar species] has benefitted from increased sunlight <br />due to canopy opening, eradication of invasive species, or otherwise reduced competition <br />for resources), and the substantial evidence would be included in the PSA. If it is <br />determined that treatment activities would be beneficial to special-status wildlife, no <br />compensatory mitigation would be required. The qualified RPF or biologist may consult <br />with CDFW and/or USFWS for technical information regarding the determination that a <br />non-listed special-status species would benefit from the treatment. <br />Project-Specific Measures <br />Northwestern pond turtle <br />To avoid impacts on northwestern pond turtle, focused visual encounter surveys will be <br />incorporated with pre-treatment surveys within suitable habitat to detect species and <br />potentially suitable burrows. Surveys would be conducted within approximately 1,500 feet <br />of aquatic habitat (e.g., streams, ponds). If upland habitat with suitable burrows/nest sites <br />for northwestern pond turtle is detected, the qualified RPF or biologist would inspect the <br />burrow to determine whether it is occupied. If northwestern pond turtle is detected or <br />assumed present, MM BIO-2b for these species would be implemented. <br />Within suitable habitat where northwestern pond turtle is detected or assumed present, <br />following measures would be implemented: <br />• Mechanized operations would be shut down when the precipitation threshold is <br />met, and the shutdown period would begin once the precipitation event has <br />ended
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.