RES 2026023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction November 2025 A-80 MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? (Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING ENTITY VERIFYING/ MONITORING ENTITY • If treatment activities occur within or adjacent to suitable or occupied habitat for special-status aquatic reptile and amphibians, MM BIO-2b requires flagging areas for avoidance and establishing no-work buffers o MM BIO-2b also states: “A qualified RPF, biologist, or biological technician will be required to monitor the effectiveness of the no- disturbance buffer around the nest, den, burrow, or other occurrence during treatment” • If impacts would remain significant under CEQA and the Project proponent determines that additional mitigation is necessary to reduce significant impacts, MM BIO-2c would be required, and incidental take permitting under CESA may be required pursuant to consultation with CDFW • If a special-status aquatic reptile or amphibian enters the Project site during treatment activities, all work would stop within a non-disturbance buffer around the individual as determined by a qualified RPF or biologist o Treatment activities would cease within the buffer until the animal leaves on its own volition • All contractors, their employees, and agency personnel involved in the implementation of the Project would check for the presence of sensitive wildlife under or next to stationary vehicles prior to operating their vehicles o If a special-status reptile or amphibian is found, the qualified RPF or biologist would determine necessary next steps to avoid impact • Pile burning treatment would avoid potential refugia for special-status aquatic reptile and amphibian species • Within suitable habitat, heavy equipment, including mowing equipment which may collapse burrows, would be utilized exclusively from stable operating surfaces such as established roads and trails Burrowing Owl