My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-100 <br /> <br /> <br />MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />and that compensatory plant populations would be preserved <br />in perpetuity <br />o For restoring or enhancing riparian habitat within the treatment area or <br />outside of the treatment area, the Compensatory Mitigation Plan would <br />include a description of the proposed habitat improvements, success <br />criteria that demonstrate the performance standard of maintained <br />habitat function has been met, legal and funding mechanisms, and <br />parties responsible for long-term management and monitoring of the <br />restored or enhanced habitat <br />The project proponent would consult with CDFW and/or any other applicable responsible <br />agency prior to finalizing the Compensatory Mitigation Plan to satisfy that responsible <br />agency’s requirements (e.g., permits, approvals) within the plan. Compensatory mitigation <br />may be satisfied through compliance with permit conditions, or other authorizations <br />obtained by the project proponent (e.g., Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement), if <br />these requirements are equally or more effective than the mitigation identified above. <br />MM BIO-4: Avoid State and Federally Protected Wetlands <br />Impacts to wetlands would be avoided using the following measures: <br />• The qualified RPF or biologist would delineate the boundaries of federally <br />protected wetlands according to methods established in the USACE wetlands <br />delineation manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the appropriate <br />regional supplement for the ecoregion in which the treatment is being <br />implemented <br />• The qualified RPF or biologist would delineate the boundaries of wetlands that <br />may not meet the definition of waters of the United States, but would qualify as <br />waters of the state, according to the state wetland procedures (California Water <br />Boards 2019 or current procedures) <br />• A qualified RPF or biologist would establish a buffer around wetlands and mark <br />the buffer boundary with high-visibility flagging, fencing, stakes, or clear, existing <br />landscape demarcations (e.g., edge of a roadway) <br />o The buffer would be a minimum width of 25 feet but may be larger if <br />deemed necessary <br />Initial <br />Treatment: Y <br />Treatment <br />Maintenance: <br />Y <br />Prior <br />and <br />during <br />The City of <br />Pleasanton <br />The City of <br />Pleasanton
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.