Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />4-4 <br /> <br /> <br />of equipment proposed for use are consistent with those analyzed in the PEIR. The inclusion of land that <br />is outside the CalVTP treatable landscape (92.5 acres) in the proposed project area constitutes a change <br />to the geographic extent presented in the PEIR. However, within the boundary of the project area, the <br />existing scenic resources are essentially the same within and outside of the treatable landscape; therefore, <br />the short-term aesthetic impact is also the same, as described above. SPRs applicable to the proposed <br />treatments are AD-4, AES-2, AQ-2, AQ-3, and REC-1, which require that public notice be given for any <br />prescribed burning activities, treatment-related equipment be stored outside of the public viewshed, an <br />SMP be submitted if the prescribed burning triggers the threshold (17 CCR Section 80160), a Burn Plan be <br />created, and recreational users be notified of any temporary recreation area closures. <br />The inclusion of land that is outside the CalVTP treatable landscape in the proposed treatment area <br />constitutes a change to the geographic extent presented in the PEIR. However, within the boundary of the <br />project area, the existing scenic resources are essentially the same within and outside of the treatable <br />landscape; therefore, the short-term aesthetic impact would also be the same, as described above. The <br />impact of the Project is consistent with the PEIR and would not constitute a substantially more severe <br />significant impact than what was covered in the PEIR. <br />4.1.1.2. Impact AES-2 <br />Initial and maintenance treatments would include shaded fuel break and WUI fuel reduction treatment <br />types. The potential for these treatment types to result in long-term degradation of the visual character <br />of an area was examined in the PEIR and found to be less than significant. Treatments would occur on both <br />public and private lands. Removal of dead or dying vegetation and hazard trees, thinning shrub-dominated <br />areas, and prescribed burning would result in a change in views. The shaded fuel break treatment would <br />retain canopy cover and retain trees larger than 6 inches DBH while limbing up larger trees to 6 feet. Shrub- <br />dominated areas would be thinned through elective removal of invasive species and dead, woody <br />vegetation and limbs. Vegetation removal activities would retain scrub, and overall dominant scrub habitat <br />type would not be converted to a different habitat type. These methods would largely preserve the natural <br />appearance. Therefore, these treatments would not substantially affect views. <br />As described in the PEIR, prescribed burning would result in grasses temporarily changing color from green <br />or brown to a dark gray/black. Grass would regrow during the following winter, so this adverse change <br />would be temporary and short in duration. Additionally, prescribed burning and wildfires occur in this area <br />under existing conditions, so similar burned vegetation is already visible in the vicinity of the treatment <br />areas. Finally, the proposed project would be designed to create a landscape appearance closer to native <br />conditions and could therefore result in long-term beneficial visual impacts. <br />As described in Impact AES-1, portions of the treatment area are visible from I-680, an eligible and official <br />designated state scenic highway, as well as locally designated scenic vistas and viewsheds. Public hiking