My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026024
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2026 10:24:53 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 10:13:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(c) Support Structures. All applicants must, to the extent technically feasible and <br /> potentially available, propose new facilities on a preferred support structure. This <br /> subsection (c) generally describes preferred and discouraged support structures, <br /> further subject to specific support structure criteria, if any, specified in Section <br /> 11(b). The approval authority shall consider whether any more preferred support <br /> structure would be technically feasible and potentially available. The approval <br /> authority may require the applicant to use a more preferred support structure when <br /> the alternative is technically feasible and potentially available. <br /> (1) Preferred Support Structures. The City's preferences for support structures <br /> are as follows, order from most preferred to least preferred: <br /> (A) collocation on an existing structure with existing wireless facilities; <br /> (B) installations on a rooftop; <br /> (C) installations on a building facade; <br /> (D) installations on an existing non-building structure (e.g., electric transmission <br /> tower, flagpole, commercial pole sign, etc.) <br /> (2) Discouraged Support Structures. When no preferred support structure is <br /> technically feasible and potentially available, the applicant may propose a <br /> wireless facility on a discouraged support structure pursuant to an exception <br /> under Section 15, including a written justification supported by factual and <br /> verifiable evidence, demonstrating that no preferred support structure is <br /> technically feasible and potentially available. If a wireless facility must be <br /> installed on a discouraged support structure, the applicant shall use the least- <br /> discouraged support structure that is technically feasible and potentially <br /> available. The following support structures are discouraged, and ordered from <br /> least discouraged to most discouraged: <br /> (A) installations on a new freestanding structure outside the public rights-of- <br /> way; <br /> (B) installations on an existing pole located within the public rights-of-way; <br /> (C) installations on a new or replacement pole within the public rights-of-way; <br /> (D) installations on a new freestanding pole within the public rights-of-way; <br /> Section 12. DESIGN STANDARDS <br /> (a) General Design Standards. The standards in this subsection (a) shall be <br /> applicable to all wireless facilities: <br /> (1) Stealth/Concealment. All wireless facilities must be stealth to the maximum <br /> extent feasible with concealment elements, measures and techniques that <br /> mimic or blend with the underlying support structure, surrounding environment <br /> and adjacent uses. <br /> Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Policy (City of Pleasanton) page 16/37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.