My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026029
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2026 4:03:41 PM
Creation date
5/18/2026 4:01:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/5/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES. 2026-029
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. 2026-029 <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br /> 2. Reasonable time limits may be imposed on both the length of the entire hearing and <br /> the length of each speaker's testimony. <br /> 3. At the conclusion of the public input portion of the hearing, the Tabulator shall begin <br /> tabulation of the ballots at the direction of the City Council, including those received <br /> during the public hearing. <br /> 4. If it is not possible to tabulate the ballots on the day of the public hearing, or if additional <br /> time is necessary for public testimony, the City Council may continue the public <br /> hearing to a later date to receive additional testimony, information, or to finish <br /> tabulating the ballots. <br /> 5. If, according to the final tabulation of the ballots, ballots submitted against the <br /> assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment, weighted <br /> according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property, a "majority <br /> protest" exists and the City Council shall not impose the assessment. <br /> SECTION 4. Written Objections and Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies (Pleasanton <br /> Municipal Code Section 1.04.120; Ordinance No. 2292). The following procedures implement <br /> Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 1.04.120 and Government Code Sections 53759.1 and <br /> 53759.2: <br /> A. City Obligations—Making Assessment Available. Concurrently with mailing the ballot <br /> package, the City shall: (1) make the proposed assessment available to the public no less <br /> than 45 days before the deadline for submitting written objections; (2) post on its website <br /> the written basis for the proposed assessment, including the Engineer's Report, <br /> Resolution of Initiation, and Resolution of Intention, and include a link to those materials <br /> in the public hearing notice; and (3) make the Engineer's Report and written basis <br /> available by mail to any ratepayer or property owner upon request. <br /> B. Submission of Timely Written Objections. A record owner may submit a written <br /> objection to the proposed assessment to the City Clerk, City of Pleasanton, 123 Main St, <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 (by mail, email, fax, or personal delivery), at any time during the a <br /> 45-day review period and up through the end of the public comment portion of the public <br /> hearing on July 21, 2026. In order for a written objection to be timely and legally sufficient <br /> under Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 1.04.120, the objection must: (1) be in writing; <br /> (2) identify the name of the record owner and the street address or assessor's parcel <br /> number of the affected property, and be signed by the.record owner; and (3) specify the <br /> grounds for alleging the proposed assessment does not comply with Proposition 218 or <br /> other applicable law, identifying the substantive requirement alleged to be violated and the <br /> factual basis for the claim. A written objection that does not specify such grounds is not <br /> legally sufficient. <br /> C. City Council Consideration and Written Response. Before or during the public <br /> hearing, the City Council shall consider, and the City shall respond in writing to, any timely <br /> written objections received. The City's written response shall explain the substantive basis <br /> for retaining or altering the proposed assessment in response to the written objections, <br /> including any reasons to reject requested amendments. The City Council may adjourn the <br /> hearing to another date if necessary to respond to comments received after the agenda is <br /> posted. Following consideration of timely written objections and the City's written <br /> responses, the City Council shall exercise its legislative discretion and determine whether: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.