Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2026-029 <br /> Page 7 of 7 <br /> (1) the written objections and the City's response warrant clarifications to the proposed <br /> assessment; (2) to reduce the proposed assessment; (3) further review of the proposed <br /> assessment is needed before determining whether clarification or reduction is warranted; <br /> or (4) to proceed with, continue, or abandon the proposed assessment. Following these <br /> determinations, the City Council shall determine whether to proceed with tabulating <br /> assessment ballots. <br /> D. Bar to Legal Proceedings. In accordance with Pleasanton Municipal Code Section <br /> 1.04.120(C), no person may bring a judicial action or proceeding alleging noncompliance <br /> with the California Constitution or other applicable law for the proposed assessment <br /> unless that person submitted to the City Clerk a timely written objection specifying the <br /> grounds for alleging noncompliance. The issues raised in any such action shall be limited <br /> to those raised in such a written objection, unless a court finds the issue could not have <br /> been raised in such an objection by those exercising reasonable diligence. <br /> E. Public Record. Any submitted written objection shall be a public record subject to <br /> disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 7920.000 <br /> et seq.). <br /> PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at <br /> a regular meeting held on May 5, 2026. <br /> I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing <br /> resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of May 2026 <br /> by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> Abstain: None <br /> Jdcdlyn K on , City Clerk <br /> APPROVED AS TO FORM: <br /> Ilth"rle <br /> Daniel G. Sodergren, Ci Attorney <br />