My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026039
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026039
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2026 4:33:20 PM
Creation date
5/27/2026 4:29:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
2026-039
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />Final EIR Responses to Written Comments <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3-127 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec03-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx <br />associated with additional trips to and from the EBRPD trail was evaluated in Appendix H of the Draft <br />EIR and discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.14, Transportation, pages 3.14-11 through 3.14-19. Further, <br />the proposed trail is required to be compliant with all operational EBRPD rules, with EBRPD staff <br />member enforcement as needed. This comment is included in the administrative record and will be <br />provided to the decision-makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, <br />substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated <br />in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required. <br />Response to T.VINSON 1-10 <br />The proposed project was introduced before the City’s Planning Commission at the December 10, <br />2025, Planning Commission meeting. Members of the public and members of the City’s Planning <br />Commission were provided with an opportunity to comment on and discuss the proposed project. <br />Additionally, this Final EIR will be presented to the City Council for certification. Please refer to the <br />Response to T.VINSON 3 for a response to the public comment received by Ted Vinson at this <br />meeting. This comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision- <br />makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with <br />respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, <br />no further response is required. <br />Response to T.VINSON 1-11 <br />Please refer to Master Response 1, Non-CEQA Issues Not Addressed in Final EIR, in Section 2, Master <br />Responses, of this document. This Master Response provides an explanation of the scope of CEQA. <br />Additionally, refer to the Response to T.VINSON 1-9 for a discussion of the EBRPD trail staging and <br />access. This comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision- <br />makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with <br />respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, <br />no further response is required. <br />Response to T.VINSON 1-12 <br />The EBRPD is identified as a Responsible Agency under CEQA and may rely on the City’s EIR, if <br />certified, in connection with its discretionary approvals, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Sections <br />15050(b) and 15096. As described in Chapter 2, Project Description, and analyzed throughout the <br />Draft EIR, the trail EBRPD dedication and trail are elements of the proposed project and, as such the <br />Draft EIR analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the staging area, trail connection, and <br />related facilities, including impacts to biological resources, aesthetics, transportation, recreation, and <br />other relevant issue areas, and identifies mitigation measures where required. Thus, potential <br />impacts related to the dedication of open space and associated trail connection are included in the <br />analysis of the Draft EIR. No separate CEQA documentation would be required. CEQA does not <br />require separate EIRs to be prepared by each public agency involved in a project when the project is <br />evaluated in a single, comprehensive EIR by the Lead Agency. Nor does CEQA require a Responsible <br />Agency to prepare a separate Draft EIR where the environmental effects of its discretionary actions <br />are adequately addressed in the Lead Agency’s EIR. To the extent that EBRPD undertakes future, <br />discretionary actions related to the regional trail system that are independent of the proposed <br />project or that were not evaluated in this Draft EIR, those actions would be subject to their own <br />CEQA review by EBRPD at the time such actions are proposed and would be subject to all applicable
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.