Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />Responses to Written Comments Final EIR <br /> <br /> <br />3-128 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec03-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx <br />streamlining and exemptions. The scope of this Draft EIR does not preclude future environmental <br />review of unrelated or expanded EBRPD trail projects. This comment is included in the administrative <br />record and will be provided to the decision-makers for review and consideration. The comment did <br />not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental <br />impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required. <br />Response to T.VINSON 1-13 <br />The existing single-family homes on the project site at 11021 and 11033 Dublin Canyon Road were <br />evaluated in Draft EIR Section 3.4, Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources, pages 3.4-11 <br />through 3.4-14. As noted in the Draft EIR, a Historic Architecture Evaluation Report was conducted <br />for these homes and found that they do not meet any of the four criterion to be eligible for listing on <br />the California Register of Historic Resources. Further, these houses are not identified as historic <br />resources within the City’s General Plan nor the NRHP.11,12 Therefore, construction of the proposed <br />project would not have an adverse impact on historic era built environment resources. This <br />comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision-makers for <br />review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to <br />the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further <br />response is required. <br />Response to T.VINSON 1-14 <br />Please refer to Master Response 1, Non-CEQA Issues Not Addressed in Final EIR, in Section 2, Master <br />Responses, of this document. This Master Response provides an explanation of the scope of CEQA <br />comment responses. As discussed in Draft EIR Chapter 6, Alternatives to the Proposed Project, page <br />6-12 and 6-13, if annexation of the project site did not occur, the zoning district established by the <br />County for the five existing parcels on the project site would remain as Agriculture. Under this zoning <br />district, each parcel on the project site is allowed to develop one single-family dwelling unit.13 <br />Additionally, since APN 941-2600-002-6 is over 25 acres in size, the development of a secondary <br />dwelling unit is permitted. Thus, a total of 6 dwelling units could be built by-right on the project site, <br />including the development of three additional dwelling units and one secondary dwelling unit. <br />As noted in Draft EIR Chapter 2, Project Description, page 2-27, the proposed project would preserve <br />117.1 acres of open space on the approximately 130.98-acre project site. Further, as discussed in <br />Draft EIR Chapter 4, Effects Found Not to be Significant, page 4-2, the project site was identified and <br />evaluated as a Housing Opportunity site in the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. The City’s <br />Housing Element Update proposed updates to the project site zoning that allowed for the <br />development of up to 31 residential units. Thus, development of 28 new single-family residences on <br />the project site would support the City in meeting its RHNA requirements. This comment is included <br />in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision-makers for review and <br />consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to the <br /> <br />11 City of Pleasanton. City of Pleasanton General Plan 2005-2025. Conservation and Open Space Element. Website: <br />https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/assets/our-government/community-development/7.%20Conservation- <br />OpenSpace%20Element%20(SA).pdf. Accessed February 2, 2026. <br />12 National Park Service. National Register Database and Research. Website: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/database- <br />research.htm. Accessed February 2, 2026. <br />13 Alameda County. Alameda County Zoning Code Chapter 17.06.030. Website: <br />https://library.municode.com/ca/alameda_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17ZO_CH17.06ADI, Accessed February 3, <br />2026.