RES 2026039 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions 13 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/FOF/21480016 Pleasanton Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project FOF.docx Impact WILD-1: The proposed project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.16-11 to 3.16-12). Impact WILD-2: The proposed project would not, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.16-12 to 3.16-13). Impact WILD-3: The proposed project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.16-13 to 3.16-14). Cumulative Wildfire Impacts: The City finds that the proposed project would have less than significant cumulative impacts with respect to wildfire. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.16-15 to 3.16-16). 1.6 - Potential Environmental Effects Which Can Be Mitigated Below a Level of Significance The City of Pleasanton hereby finds that feasible mitigation measures have been identified in the EIR that will avoid or substantially lessen the following potentially significant environmental impacts discussed below to a less than significant level. The potentially significant impacts, and the mitigation measures that will reduce them to a less than significant level, are as follows: 1.6.1 - Impact AES-4: Daytime Glare Impact AES-4: The proposed project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (Draft EIR, p. 3.1-16). Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR. (CEQA Guidelines § 15091(a)(1)). Mitigation Measures MM AES-4 Adhere to Design Review Process and Standards As part of the design review process for the proposed project, the applicant shall include the following features in its design review submittal: xx Structures facing a public street or neighboring property shall use minimally reflective glass, and other materials and colors used on the exterior of buildings and structures shall be selected with attention to minimizing reflective glare.