Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton <br />Landscape Maintenance District No. 1993-1, Windsor <br />Engineer’s Report <br /> <br />Page 31 <br /> <br />The esƟmates used above for the City of Pleasanton’s “in-kind,” non-monetary <br />contribuƟons for the maintenance, rehabilitaƟon and replacement of the curbs <br />and guƩers, storm drainage systems, local streets (the “supporƟve <br />infrastructure”), and the value of the iniƟal Improvements constructed by the <br />Developer, are based on industry standards; typical and standard quanƟty raƟos <br />between this supporƟve infrastructure (including the City’s relaƟve associated <br />maintenance costs) and similar Improvements; and on the assessment Engineer’s <br />professional experience on planning and working in such projects. <br /> <br />Source of ContribuƟons from Other Funds to SaƟsfy 19.6% Requirement <br /> City non-monetary contribuƟons: <br /> 10.0% (Curb and guƩer) <br /> + 10.0% (Storm drainage system) <br /> + 10.0% (Public roads) <br /> + 20.0% (AmorƟzed value of iniƟal construcƟon) <br /> = 50.0% (Total General Benefit paid from other funds) <br /> <br />Zones of Benefit <br />The boundaries of the Assessment Area are carefully drawn to only include the <br />properƟes that are proximate to the Improvements and that would materially <br />benefit from the Improvements. <br />In SVTA, the court noted that even a local agency-wide assessment district is <br />appropriate under the right condiƟons: <br />“Thus, if an assessment district is narrowly drawn, the fact that a benefit is <br />conferred throughout the district does not make it general rather than special. In <br />that circumstance, the characterizaƟon of a benefit may depend on whether the <br />Page 152 of 617