My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULA MEETING AGENDA PACKET _Revised_ 6-2-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
060226 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULA MEETING AGENDA PACKET _Revised_ 6-2-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2026 2:56:22 PM
Creation date
5/29/2026 2:52:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/2/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
617
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> <br />City of Pleasanton <br />Landscape Maintenance District No. 1984-1, Ponderosa Engineer’s Report, Fiscal Year 2026-27 <br /> <br />The five District’s benefit assessments were established prior to the approval of <br />Proposition 218 in 1996. The purpose of these Districts is to provide funding for the <br />installation, maintenance and servicing of local landscaping and lighting improvements <br />(“Improvements”) within each District’s service area. <br /> <br />Landscape Maintenance District No. 1984-1, Ponderosa <br />Assessment Background <br />The Ponderosa Landscape Maintenance District No. 1984-1 (“District 1984-1” or <br />“Maintenance District”) was formed in 1984 as a Condition of Approval for the <br />Ponderosa development, to fund certain landscape improvements within the Ponderosa <br />subdivision. <br /> <br />The Ponderosa single-family residential project was approved in two phases, October <br />1983 and January 1985. The Ponderosa Landscape Maintenance District No. 1984 -1 <br />has a total of 344 parcels, 343 are single family residences, and 1 parcel is owned by <br />the City, which is the location of Del Prado Park. <br /> <br />The Ponderosa Landscape Maintenance District No. 1984-1 purpose is to fund the <br />maintenance of the existing Ponderosa subdivision landscaping, trees, shrubbery, <br />groundcover, irrigation systems in the area north of Corte Flores on the west side of <br />Paseo Santa Cruz, and north of Corte Pacifica on the east side of Paseo Santa Cruz. <br /> <br />District 1984-1 is funded by the benefit assessment approved in 1984 (“Assessment”) <br />and does not receive any direct revenues from property taxes or any other funding <br />sources. Based on research of historical documents and in consultation with their <br />consultant, SCI Consulting Group, and an attorney that specializes in assessment law, <br />JarvisFay, the fiscal year 2025-26 assessments for District 1984-1 were restored to the <br />amount that was approved by Resolution 88-375, which was the first assessment on <br />record, and was for $60.08 per parcel per year. Under Proposition 218, a property <br />owner vote is only required when these assessments are increased, and an <br />assessment is not increased if it is set at an amount that is no more than the maximum <br />amount initially authorized when the assessment district was created. (Cal. Const. Art. <br />XIII D, § 5(b); Gov. Code § 53750(h)(2)(B).) Assessment levels will remain the same <br />this year, with a total of 344 parcels in the District, the fiscal year 2026-27 total <br />assessment will be $21,017.38. <br /> <br />The fiscal year 2026-27 total assessment remains at the level approved at formation but <br />is still insufficient to fund the maintenance of all common areas, including water costs, <br />county assessment fees, city administration fees, replacement of plantings, irrigation <br />systems, and other district improvements. The Engineer’s Report projects a shortage <br />that will require the City to reduce landscape maintenance and water use so that <br />maintenance costs remain below assessments. <br /> <br />An increase in the annual assessment will be necessary to meet the maintenance <br />standards of the District into the future. The city can no longer subsidize staff <br />Page 87 of 617
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.