Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> <br />City of Pleasanton <br />Landscape Maintenance District No. 1984-1, Ponderosa Engineer’s Report, Fiscal Year 2026-27 <br />administration time or the consultant fees for the Engineer’s Report. The consultant fees <br />for the Proposition 218-compliant vote cost approximately $36,000 plus staff time. <br />Water costs, which require a significant portion of the LMD budget, increased thirty <br />percent in calendar year 2024, another twelve percent in 2025, and were changed to a <br />tiered system in 2026 and are expected to continue to rise. <br /> <br />Even with the restoration of the approved increased assessment amount, the city will be <br />forced to reduce maintenance and postpone facilities upgrades and tree pruning, <br />resulting in a continuing deterioration of the grounds and facilities , which may place the <br />district at risk to potential fines or litigation. To limit liability for the district, staff has <br />proceeded with a 218-compliant vote running on a parallel path, with this Engineer’s <br />Report being the fallback report if the vote does not pass. Staff conducted significant <br />public outreach, held 3 neighborhood meetings, sent out a survey to all property <br />owners, provided a dedicated webpage to the district, and worked to make sure the final <br />ballot measure was reflective of the input received by the property owners. In the case <br />the vote does not pass, another Proposition 218-compliant vote will need to be held in <br />the future, incurring significant consultant costs, until a sustainable assessment has <br />been agreed to by property owners. <br /> <br />For 2025-26 costs/revenues, see Figure 4 – FY 2025-26 Actual Costs and Revenues. <br /> <br />Engineer’s Report and Proposed Assessments <br />Each year for which the assessments will be approved, the City Council must direct the <br />preparation of an Engineer's Report, budgets, and proposed assessments for the <br />upcoming fiscal year. After the Engineer's Report is completed, the City Council may <br />preliminarily approve the Engineer's Report and proposed assessments and establish <br />the date for a public hearing on the continuation of the assessments. This Report was <br />prepared pursuant to the direction of the City Council. <br /> <br />This Engineer’s Report ("Report") was prepared to establish the budget for the <br />continued maintenance, improvements, and services (“Improvements”) that would be <br />funded by the proposed fiscal year 2026-27 assessments, determine the benefits <br />received by property from the Improvements, and the method of assessment <br />apportionment to lots and parcels within the Maintenance District. This Report and the <br />proposed assessments have been made pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act <br />of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code ("Act") and <br />Article XIIID of the California Constitution (“Article”). <br /> <br />If the City Council approves this Engineer's Report and the proposed assessments by <br />resolution, a notice of public hearing must be published in a local paper at least 10 days <br />prior to the date of the public hearing. The resolution preliminarily approving the <br />Engineer's Report and establishing the date for a public hearing is used for this notice. <br /> <br />Following the minimum 10-day period after publishing the notice, a public hearing is <br />held for the purpose of allowing public testimony about the proposed assessments. This <br />Page 88 of 617