My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETTIMG AGENDA PACKET 7-7-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
070726 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETTIMG AGENDA PACKET 7-7-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2026 11:54:14 AM
Creation date
7/2/2026 11:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/7/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 of 5 <br />prepare and file an argument, in which case the names of the authorized members would be <br />inserted into the resolution. <br /> <br />The City Council may also elect not to file an argument, in which case selection for arguments <br />will proceed in the priority order as established by Elections Code section 9287. <br /> <br />Rebuttal arguments are governed by Elections Code section 9285. Once arguments on both <br />sides of a measure are selected, the authors of each argument may file a rebuttal argument of <br />up to 250 words. <br /> <br />The resolution also directs the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the measure. <br /> <br />Next Steps <br />If the resolution is adopted, staff will submit the required materials to Alameda County, and the <br />City Attorney will prepare an impartial analysis of the measure for the voter information guide. <br />The table below outlines the anticipated deadlines for submittal of arguments. <br /> <br />July 7, 2026 City Council adopts the resolution, <br />formally placing the TOT measure on the <br />November 3, 2026 ballot, and provides <br />direction on written ballot arguments <br />August 5, 2026 City Attorney Impartial Analysis <br />August 13, 2026 by 4:00 p.m. Primary arguments due to the City Clerk <br />August 20, 2026 by 4:00 p.m Rebuttal arguments due to the City Clerk <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY <br />Generating sufficient revenue and ensuring the City's fiscal sustainability allows the City to <br />continue providing programs and services that benefit all residents. Unlike a sales tax or parcel <br />tax, the TOT is paid primarily by visitors staying in Pleasanton hotels and motels, rather than <br />by local residents or property owners. General Fund revenue generated by the measure would <br />support City services that benefit all residents, including public safety, parks and recreation, <br />infrastructure maintenance and community programs. <br /> <br />OUTREACH <br />Because the proposed measure is paid by visitors rather than by Pleasanton residents, staff <br />has had targeted conversations with Pleasanton hotel operators to discuss the proposed rate <br />structure and phased implementation. Staff will develop community education materials in <br />compliance with applicable laws governing public agency communications on ballot measures <br />and will coordinate with the City Attorney’s Office on the content and timing of those materials. <br /> <br />STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT <br />This item aligns with the ONE Pleasanton strategic plan goal of Funding Our Future, which <br />supports financial health and sound fiscal policies. <br />Page 136 of 214
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.