My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 04222026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
04-22
>
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 04222026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 11:22:28 AM
Creation date
7/8/2026 11:15:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
DOCUMENT DATE
4/22/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
593
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P18-0078, P18-0080, P18-0081, PUD-130 and Tract 8569 (Hidden Canyon) Planning Commission <br />5of 28 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Hillside Development <br />Measures PP and QQ <br />In the November 2008 general election, Pleasanton voters passed two initiatives: Measure PP, <br />the Save Pleasanton’s Hills and Housing Cap2 Initiative, and Measure QQ, the Pleasanton <br />Ridgelines Protection and Growth Control Initiative. Measure PP prohibits “grading to construct <br />residential or commercial structures…on hillside slopes of 25 percent or greater, or within 100 <br />vertical feet of a ridgeline.” However, Measure PP provides an exemption for existing lots of <br />record3 and allows a maximum of 10 units on such properties. Measure QQ reaffirmed existing <br />policies and programs in the City’s 1996 General Plan regarding the preservation of scenic <br />hillsides and ridge views. <br />The passage of Measure PP resulted in the addition of Land Use Element Program 21.3 to the <br />General Plan, which reads: <br />Ridgelines and hillsides shall be protected. Housing units and structures shall not be <br />placed on slopes of 25 percent or greater, or within 100 vertical feet of a ridgeline. No <br />grading to construct residential or commercial structures shall occur on hillside slopes <br />25 percent or greater, or within 100 vertical feet of a ridgeline. Exempt from this policy <br />are housing developments of 10 or fewer housing units on a single property. Splitting, <br />dividing or subdividing a ‘legal parcel’ to approve more than 10 housing units is not <br />allowed. <br />Accordingly, hillside developments would be required to adhere to Measures PP and QQ and <br />the General Plan. <br />Southeast Hills Mapping <br />In 2017, the City undertook an exercise, known as the “Southeast Hills Mapping,” to study and <br />develop a methodology for evaluation of hillside development’s consistency with Measure PP <br />restrictions. The purpose of the study and methodology was to ensure future development <br />would be consistent with Measure PP and minimize future land-use conflicts by providing <br />clarity to property owners and the City on issues related to slope and ridgeline setbacks. The <br />study area focused on the Southeast Hills, an approximately 1,520-acre area in the southeast <br />of Pleasanton. Through geographic information systems (GIS) mapping, site visits, studies of <br />neighboring communities (i.e., Danville, Moraga, Orinda, and San Ramon), and research, staff <br />prepared maps of the Southeast Hills and developed a methodology for identifying slopes, <br />ridgelines, and ridgeline setbacks. <br />The City Council adopted the mapping and methodology in 2017, and at that time determined <br />it should be applied more broadly to other parts of the City where development on hillsides is <br />proposed. (See City Council Resolution 17-981, Southeast Hills Mapping and Methodology). <br />With the adoption of Resolution 17-981, individual project sites are expected to use the <br />methodology adopted to map their sites, “but could show a finer-grained pattern of areas <br />2 Certain provisions of Measure PP related to the City’s Housing Cap were invalidated by the Alameda County <br />Superior Court as conflicting with State law that mandates communities to meet regional housing requirements. <br />3 As of January 1, 2007.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.