Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026

requests. This prevents a full public review of the proceedings and reinforces the conclusion that public input was not a meaningful factor in the final decision. Supporting Documentation To substantiate these arguments, this appeal is accompanied by a comprehensive set of supporting documents for your review, submitted as exhibits. These include: Letters of support from concerned neighbors who share these objections. Extensive photographic evidence documenting the site conditions and prospective negative impacts. Copies of all relevant email correspondence with the City of Pleasanton Planning Department (including with Planning Assistant Natalie Amos), as well as communications between neighbors and with the Shadow Cliff Village HOA. Conclusion The approval of project P26-0136 was the result of a flawed process. The decision was based on factually incorrect findings, relied on a questionable application of the City's own development standards, and improperly dismissed the valid testimony of concerned residents. The proposed addition will cause demonstrable harm to our property's value, privacy, and enjoyment. We urge the Planning Commission to recognize the significant procedural and substantive errors made by the Zoning Administrator, grant this appeal, and overturn the approval of Application P26-0136. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Ekaterina Utova