My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
05-13
>
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 11:54:19 AM
Creation date
7/8/2026 11:49:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
397
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT P. O. BOX 520 · 200 Old Bernal Avenue <br />www.cityofpleasantonca.gov Pleasanton, CA 94566-0802 <br />Planning Building & Safety Code Enforcement Permit Center Traffic Engineering <br />(925) 931-5600 (925) 931-5300 (925) 931-5620 (925) 931-5630 (925) 931-5677 <br /> <br />March 18, 2026 <br />Via Email <br />1039 Serpentine Lane, Ste. D <br />Pleasanton, CA. 94566 <br />Subject: P26-0136, 2986 Liberty Drive <br />Single-Family Design Review for the proposal to construct an approximately 816- <br />square-foot single- and two-story addition on the west elevation of the residence. <br />Effective Date: March 30, 2026 <br />Dear Mr. Hereld: <br />On March 18, 2026, the Zoning Administrator (ZA) approved the above-referenced application. <br />In making this decision, I, as the ZA, was required to make the following findings: <br />Finding 1: The project’s approval is in the best interest of public health, safety, and <br />general welfare. <br /> <br />I found the proposed project was in the best interest of public health, safety, and general <br />welfare. The addition represented a compatible reinvestment in an existing single-family <br />residence and did not introduce any conditions that would be detrimental to surrounding <br />properties or the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Concerns related to building intensity, proximity to adjacent homes, and potential <br />overdevelopment are mitigated by the project’s compliance with and, in some instances, <br />exceedance of objective development standards prescribed by the Pleasanton Municipal <br />Code (PMC), including setbacks, height limitations, and floor area ratio, all of which are <br />specifically intended to ensure adequate separation between structures, access to light and <br />air, and neighborhood livability. <br /> <br />Additionally, the project did not introduce unsafe conditions, and all construction will be <br />required to comply with applicable building and fire codes. Conditions of approval have <br />also been applied to the project to ensure the applicant adheres to strict construction <br />hours, meets noise standards, controls dust to the extent feasible, and maintains the site <br />neat and litter-free for the duration of construction. <br />Therefore, this finding can be made.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.