My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
05-13
>
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 11:54:19 AM
Creation date
7/8/2026 11:49:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
397
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Appeal of P26-0136, 2986 Liberty Drive Planning Commission, May 13, 2026 <br />2 of 7 <br />Pursuant to the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC), additions exceeding 15 feet in height are <br />subject to Single-Family Design Review approval. As conditioned, staff finds that the project <br />satisfies all applicable design review findings and development standards. Therefore, staff <br />recommends the Planning Commission deny the appeal and affirm <br />approval. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />On February 23, 2026, the applicant submitted a Single-Family Design Review application to <br />construct the proposed addition on the west street-side of the residence. Staff determined the <br />project complied with applicable development standards and issued public notification to <br />property owners and occupants within a 300-foot radius of the project site. <br /> <br />In response to the notification, opposition of the project was received from the adjacent east <br />property owner (2982 Liberty Drive), two rear property owners (2902 and 2906 Liberty Drive), <br />and the property owner at 2966 Liberty Drive. The two rear property owners formally requested <br />a Zoning Administrator hearing. <br /> <br />Consistent with City procedures, notice of the Zoning Administrator hearing was provided to <br />the parties involved. While additional mailed noticing is not required, one neighbor <br />regarding the hearing to all subdivision residents, resulting in higher Zoning Administrator <br />public attendance. <br /> <br />At the March 18, 2026, Zoning Administrator public hearing, concerns were raised regarding <br />the scale and massing of the addition, potential neighborhood precedent, construction-related <br />impacts (noise, dust, and safety), shadowing, and proximity to adjacent rear properties. After <br />consideration of all testimony and materials, the Zoning Administrator made the required <br />findings and approved the project, subject to conditions of approval. <br /> <br />The decision was subsequently appealed on March 30, 2026, and is now before the Planning <br />Commission, at which the Commission will independently consider the project and render its <br />own determination based on the record. <br /> <br />SITE AND AREA DESCRIPTION <br />The project site is a flat, approximately 5,540-square-foot corner lot developed with a two-story <br />single-family residence of approximately 1,400 square feet and an attached 478-square-foot <br />garage. The site adjoins one side (east) and two rear (south) property lines shared with <br />detached single-family residences. <br /> <br />The property is located within the Shadow Cliff Village subdivision, a 200-unit detached single- <br />family residential neighborhood developed in the late 1980s, consisting primarily of two-story <br />homes (188 two-story and 12 single-story homes). The subdivision is bordered by East Bay <br />Regional Park District land to the north and east, detached single-family neighborhoods to the <br />southeast and south, and manufactured housing to the west. <br /> <br />Figures 1 and 2 provide site and area context. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.