Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 35 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/FOF/21480016 Pleasanton Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project FOF.docx <br />xx Evaluating the lateral extent and depth of colluvial soils. <br />x Performing a seismic refraction survey to determine shear wave velocities at <br />deeper depths. <br />x Analyzing and developing slope grading and engineered buttress fill design <br />criteria. <br />x Evaluating upslope sources of water. <br />x Evaluating the Site Classification for Seismic Design. <br />x Estimating appropriate minimum building setbacks from the face of fill slopes. <br /> <br />The qualified Geotechnical Engineer would be required to demonstrate that <br />implementation of the recommendations would reduce potential impacts associated <br />with liquefaction and landslide potential to below a level of significance in <br />conformance with the standards in the California Building Standards Code (CBC). The <br />applicant would be required to incorporate all recommended design features into <br />project building plans, for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the <br />issuance of any building or grading permits. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: <br />Seismic-induced Ground Failure <br />According to the Updated Geotechnical and Geologic Report, the main development area <br />encompassing the 28 proposed single-family homes has low liquefaction potential. (Draft EIR, p. 3.6- <br />25). However, the northeastern and southeastern portions of the project site have a moderate to <br />high liquefaction potential. (Draft EIR, p. 3.6-26). Therefore, to ensure compliance with General Plan <br />policies and programs, including Program 5.1 and 5.2 requiring the use of site-specific studies or <br />geotechnical engineering studies, the proposed project would implement MM GEO-1. <br />Implementation of MM GEO-1 would involve the hiring of a qualified Geotechnical Engineer to <br />prepare a design-level geotechnical investigation and to provide recommendations that would be <br />incorporated into the design of the proposed project to further reduce impacts related to seismic- <br />induced ground failure such as liquefaction. Through implementation of MM GEO-1, the proposed <br />project would reduce impacts resulting from seismic-induced ground failure to less than significant. <br />Landslides <br />The project site is situated on complex topography with moderately steep to steep hillsides ranging <br />from 774 feet in elevation above mean sea level (AMSL) on the western portion of the project site to <br />approximately 438 feet AMSL along Devany Creek on the eastern portion of the project site. The <br />Updated Geotechnical and Geologic Report concludes that while a majority of natural slopes are <br />relatively stable, proposed cuts during future grading could affect the stability of finished slopes. <br />(Draft EIR, pp. 3.6-26 to 3.6-27). This could result in a potentially significant impact to landslides as a <br />result of strong seismic shaking. To reduce these impacts, and to demonstrate compliance with <br />General Plan Programs 5.1 and 5.2, the proposed project would implement MM GEO-1. Through <br />implementation of MM GEO-1, the proposed project would reduce impacts resulting from seismic- <br />induced landslides to less than significant. <br />   <br /><br /> <br /> <br />