Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2026-10 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting of April 22, 2026, the Planning <br />Commission conducted a public hearing at which it considered the agenda report, all public <br />testimony, relevant exhibits, and staff recommendations regarding the approvals of the Project <br />entitlements and the Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement labeled as Attachment 1 <br />included hereto and made a part hereof; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on April 22, 2026, by adoption of Resolution No. PC-2026-08, the Planning <br />Commission recommended the City Council certify the EIR for the Project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on April 22, 2026, by adoption of Resolution No. PC-2026-09, the Planning <br />Commission recommended the City Council approve all necessary entitlements for the Project; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found the Pre-Annexation and Development <br />Agreement was consistent with the General Plan and would provide substantial public benefits, <br />including open space preservation, transportation and infrastructure improvements, and <br />financial contributions toward public facilities. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of <br />Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and written agenda <br />reports and all public comment and testimony: <br /> <br />Section 1: The recitals set forth above are adopted as if restated here in full. <br /> <br />Section 2: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council, prior to taking action on <br />the Project, make the findings in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. PC-2026-08 and PC- <br />2026-09 with respect to certifying the EIR and considerations for the PUD Development Plan <br />and Vesting Tentative Map. <br /> <br />Section 3: Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867.5, the Planning <br />Commission recommends the City Council, prior to taking action on the Project, finds the <br />approval of the Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement, based on the terms, would <br />provide substantial public benefits, including open space preservation, transportation and <br />infrastructure improvements, and financial contributions toward public facilities, and is <br />consistent with the General Plan, insomuch as it: <br /> <br />a. contains all terms required by state law, as reflected in California Government Code <br />Section 65865.2, including the duration (10 year initial term, with option to extend an <br />additional 18 months), as well as the permitted uses of the property, density or <br />intensity of use, maximum height and size of proposed building, and provisions for <br />reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, as set forth in the Project <br />entitlement approvals described above; <br /> <br />b. is consistent with the General Plan, per California Government Code Section <br />65867.5(b), in that it will implement various General Plan policies and programs, <br />including: <br /> <br />    <br /><br /><br /><br /><br />  <br />