PC-2026-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

RESOLUTION NO. PC-2026-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE ARROYO LAGO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT (SCH NO. 2023050339), AS FILED UNDER CASE NO. P25-0115, P25-0116, P25-0118, PUD-154, and TRACT 8423 WHEREAS, on August 26, 2022, 330 Land Company (“Applicant”), on behalf of USL Pleasanton, LP, (“Property Owner”), submitted an application to the County of Alameda (“County”) for the construction of a residential project consisting of 194 residential units and 49 junior accessory dwelling units, on and off-site utilities and related improvements (“County Project”); and WHEREAS, per the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) the County caused an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) (SCH No. 2023050339) to be prepared for the County Project, providing the public and the decision-makers with detailed information about the County Project's environmental effects, ways to minimize the project's significant environmental effects, and reasonable alternatives to the project; and WHEREAS, the EIR identified that most environmental impacts from development of the County Project were less than significant or could be mitigated to less than significant through incorporation of feasible and reasonable mitigation measures; and WHEREAS, the EIR identified impacts from development of the County Project related to greenhouse gas emissions and transportation that were significant and unavoidable, even with the incorporation of feasible and reasonable mitigation measures, requiring the County to adopt Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, the EIR included a comparative impact assessment of reasonable alternatives to the County Project, including Alternative 2: Annexation into the City of Pleasanton Alternative, which concluded that most environmental impacts from the project would be reduced under this alternative due to access to City of Pleasanton (”City”) utilities and a reduced development footprint; and WHEREAS, the EIR determined that due to these reduced environmental impact levels, Alternative 2 was the Environmentally Superior Alternative, and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2026, the County Board of Supervisors adopted Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and certified the EIR in compliance with all applicable provisions under CEQA; and WHEREAS, on February 25, 2026, the Applicant, on behalf of the Property Owner, submitted applications to the City for: (1) Annexation (P25-0115) of an approximately 30 acres (the Project Site) from unincorporated Alameda County to the City; (2) General Plan Amendments (P25-0116) to redesignate land uses from Community Facilities – Other Public and Institutional; High Density Residential; Business Park/Retail/Highway/Service Commercial Docusign Envelope ID: DDC42BBB-1CDA-8623-8208-0F866D2C3168