My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2026-15
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
PC-2026-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2026 12:52:06 PM
Creation date
8/5/2026 12:48:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ARROYO LAGO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT <br /> ADDENDUM <br /> <br /> <br />86 FCS <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480036/Addendum/21480036 Arroyo Lago Residential Project Addendum.docx <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The proposed project would be constructed in the same location as the land studied in the Prior FEIR, <br />which determined that special-status plant species were absent from the project site and, accordingly, <br />found there were no impacts on special-status or rare plant species. The proposed project would <br />have slightly fewer units than the County Project and would not involve the construction and operation <br />of the substantial off-site utility infrastructure contemplated by the County Project, other than the <br />bioretention area and detention basin. Therefore, the proposed project would result in less overall soil <br />disturbance due to the updated project design. As such, impacts related to habitats of special-status <br />plant and animal species would be slightly less than those of the County Project. <br />With respect to special-status wildlife, even though the proposed project would result in a reduced <br />amount of ground disturbance due to the reduction of proposed dwelling units and off-site <br />infrastructure, the proposed project would still be located in an area that supports habitat for special- <br />status nesting birds and burrowing owls. As such, the proposed project would be required to <br />implement MM BIO-1a and MM BIO-1b, which require protocol-level burrowing owl surveys, pre- <br />construction nesting bird surveys, and avoidance of direct and indirect impacts on nests. With the <br />implementation of these mitigation measures, impacts on special-status species would be less than <br />significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not introduce new significant impacts or create <br />substantially more severe significant impacts than those previously identified in the Prior FEIR. No <br />additional analysis is required. <br />b) Riparian Habitat and Sensitive Natural Communities <br />Would the project: Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other <br />sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, <br />policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and <br />Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />Prior FEIR Conclusions <br />The Prior FEIR found that the eastern portion of the Study Area, east of El Charro Road, contains <br />approximately 5.87 acres of Fremont poplar and mixed willow stands, as well as a drainage swale, <br />which contains riparian habitat.24 The Prior FEIR considered the location of an approximately 0.9-acre <br />bioretention area under two design options. Design Option A would cluster the bioretention area <br />directly east of the WWTP and south of the recycled water storage facility. Design Option B would <br />locate the bioretention area southwest of the agricultural irrigation fields, adjacent to the east side of <br />El Charro Road. The Prior FEIR determined that neither Design Option A nor Design Option B is <br />expected to have direct or indirect impacts on the potential depressional wetland feature. However, <br />under Design Option B, the proposed project may result in indirect impacts to the adjacent drainage <br />swale and associated riparian vegetation due to the location of the proposed bioretention area. <br /> <br />24 The Study Area is generally located south of Lakes I and H, and west of Cope Lake (part of the Zone 7 Water Agency <br />Chain of Lakes), although there is a portion of the Study Area that bisects Lake I and Cope Lake. The Study Area <br />consists of three Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs)—APN 946-4634-1, 946-4634-2, and 946-1350-3-10.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.