Laserfiche WebLink
ARROYO LAGO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT <br />ADDENDUM <br /> <br /> <br />FCS 95 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480036/Addendum/21480036 Arroyo Lago Residential Project Addendum.docx <br />historical significance. Therefore, the Prior FEIR concluded that impacts would be less than <br />significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.4-24; 6-14). <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />As described in the Prior FEIR, records search results conducted at the Northwest Information Center <br />(NWIC) identified three historic resources (P-01-000193, P-01-001783, and P 01-002190) located <br />within the 0.5-mile records search radius around the project site. However, similar to the County <br />Project, these resources are not located within the project site or the limit of disturbance areas, nor <br />would they be adversely impacted by the proposed project. Additionally, no historic resources were <br />encountered during the pedestrian field survey conducted as part of the Prior FEIR. As such, because <br />the proposed project would be constructed in the same location as the County Project albeit with less <br />overall ground disturbance, the results of the record searches and community survey conducted <br />under the Prior FEIR would still apply to the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would <br />not have a significant adverse impact on historic era built environment resources. Therefore, the <br />proposed project would not introduce new significant impacts or create substantially more severe <br />significant impacts than those previously identified in the Prior FEIR. No additional analysis is <br />required. <br />b) Archaeological Resources <br />Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an <br />archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? <br />Prior FEIR Conclusions <br />As described in the Prior FEIR, record search results from the NWIC did not identify any prehistoric <br />archaeological resources located within the project site or within the 0.5-mile search radius around <br />the project site. Additionally, the Sacred Lands File search conducted by the Native American <br />Heritage Commission (NAHC) was negative for Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) within the project <br />site. However, the Prior FEIR found that the project site has the potential to contain buried <br />archaeological resources because the project site and limit of disturbance areas are situated on <br />undivided Holocene and/or earlier Pleistocene deposits that have the potential to contain <br />archaeological resources. <br />Although no archaeological resources were encountered during the field survey, MM CUL-2a and MM <br />CUL-2b require a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training for construction <br />personnel and outline procedures for halting work near the find and consulting a qualified <br />Archaeologist if resources are discovered during ground disturbance. These measures would ensure <br />that any inadvertently encountered significant archaeological resources are properly identified and <br />treated. Therefore, the Prior FEIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant with <br />mitigation incorporated. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.4-24, 6-14). <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The proposed project would be constructed in the same location as the County Project; therefore, the <br />results of the record searches and the pedestrian field survey conducted under the Prior FEIR would