Laserfiche WebLink
330 Land Company, LLC Arroyo Lago <br />9785.004.001 Design-Level Geotechnical Report <br /> <br /> <br /> Page | 6 April 16, 2024 <br />Latest Revision October 31, 2025 <br />2.4.3 Seismicity <br /> <br />The San Francisco Bay Area contains numerous active faults. Figure 4 shows the approximate <br />location of active and potentially active faults and significant historic earthquakes mapped within <br />the San Francisco Bay Region. An active fault is defined by the state as one that has had surface <br />displacement within Holocene time, about the last 11,700 years (CGS, 2018). <br /> <br />To identify nearby active faults that are capable of generating strong seismic ground shaking at <br />the site, we utilized the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Unified Hazard Tool and <br />disaggregated the hazard at peak ground acceleration for a return period of 2,475 years. The <br />nearest active fault with a significant contribution (greater than 1 percent) to the overall seismic <br />hazard at the site is the Northern trace of the Calaveras fault, approximately 5 miles to the <br />southwest. Other nearby faults capable of producing significant ground shaking at the site are <br />shown in Table 2.4.3-1. <br /> <br />TABLE 2.4.3-1: Active Faults Capable of Producing Significant Ground Shaking at the <br />Site, Latitude: 37.6786 Longitude: -121.8563 <br />SOURCE RRUP MOMENT MAGNITUDE <br />MW (km) (miles) <br />Calaveras (No) [4] 8.1 5.0 7.1 <br />Las Positas [1] 8.7 5.4 5.6 <br />Mount Diablo Thrust [0] 11.5 7.1 7.1 <br />Greenville (No) [4] 14.6 9.1 7.0 <br />Hayward (So) [4] 15.6 9.7 7.1 <br />Notes: a. Fault System (Fault Section) [Fault Subsection assigned by UCERF3] <br />b. RRUP = nearest fault-to-site rupture distance <br />c. Fault-to-site distances and maximum moment magnitude based on USGS Unified Hazard Tool <br />Edition: Dynamic Conterminous U.S. 2018 <br /> <br />These results represent sources contributing at least 1 percent to the seismic hazard at the site <br />for the peak ground acceleration and for the given return period. Gridded or areal sources are not <br />presented; however, these sources did not contribute more than 1 percent to the seismic hazard <br />for the peak ground acceleration and for the given return period. <br /> <br />2.5 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br /> <br />At the time of our field explorations, the site was occupied by vacant, lightly vegetated land. As <br />previously discussed, the ground surface elevation of the site ranges from approximately <br />Elevation 357 to 362 feet (NAVD88). <br /> <br />The subsurface conditions in previous and current explorations generally encountered existing fill <br />across the site up to 162½ feet bgs in the northern pit and up to 70 feet bgs in Busch Pit. <br />Subsurface conditions encountered underlying the existing fill were generally interpreted as <br />floodplain deposits. <br /> <br />Further description of subsurface conditions of existing fill materials and native alluvium deposits <br />are provided in the below sections. The Site Plan and exploration logs can be reviewed for specific <br />subsurface conditions at each exploratory location. We include our boring exploration logs in <br />Appendix A, and select previous exploration logs in Appendices D and E. The boring logs contain <br />the soil type, color, consistency, and visual classification in general accordance with the Unified