My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2026-15
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
PC-2026-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2026 12:52:06 PM
Creation date
8/5/2026 12:48:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2026-15 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />4. the Planning Commission finds and recommends the City Council find that the <br />Project is consistent with the City's General Plan and existing policies, including <br />General Plan Land Use Policy 25 (“Annex urbanized pockets of unincorporated <br />land adjacent to the city limits in areas where landowners are willing to accept <br />City services and development standards”), insomuch as the Project will annex a <br />nearly 30-acre pocket of unincorporated Alameda County adjacent to the city <br />limits into the City and the applicants are willing to accept City services and <br />development standards; and <br />5. the Planning Commission does hereby find and recommends the City Council <br />find and certify that the Addendum to the County EIR for the Project has been <br />prepared and completed in compliance with CEQA; <br />6. the Planning Commission does hereby find and recommends the City Council <br />find and certify that the Addendum to the County EIR for the Project reflects the <br />City's independent judgment and analysis; and <br />7. to the extent required by law, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding <br />Considerations prepared by Alameda County with regard to the EIR remain <br />accurate and are hereby incorporated by reference; and <br />8. the Planning Commission confirms and recommends the City Council confirm <br />that no new or additional environmental analysis is required for the Project, as <br />the Addendum to the County EIR for the Project adequately addresses the <br />environmental impacts of the Project, consistent with CEQA and the CEQA <br />Guidelines. <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: the Planning Commission hereby recommends to <br />the City Council of the City of Pleasanton that, prior to the approval of the Project, the City <br />Council adopt the Addendum as complete, adequate, and in compliance with CEQA and the <br />CEQA Guidelines. <br /> <br />PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of <br />Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on June 24, 2026, by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Commissioners Jagoe, Morgan, Wedge, and Chair Pace <br />Noes: Commissioners <br />Absent: Commissioners Commissioner Jain <br />Abstain: Commissioners <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________ ______________________________ <br />Derek Farmer Brandon Pace <br />Secretary, Planning Commission Chair <br /> <br /> <br />Docusign Envelope ID: DDC42BBB-1CDA-8623-8208-0F866D2C3168
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.