PC-2026-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2026-15 Page 3 of 6 WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting of June 24, 2026, the Planning Commission considered the Addendum along with the written agenda report, all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and staff recommendations as to the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton does resolve, declare, determine, and order the following: A. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. B. The Addendum reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis on the potential environmental impacts of the Project, and provides information to the decision-makers and the public on the environmental consequences of approving the Project. Specifically, the Planning Commission does make and adopt the following findings and certifications in compliance with the requirements of CEQA: 1. the Planning Commission has independently reviewed and considered the Addendum for the Project, along with the County EIR; and 2. the mitigation measures from the County EIR for the Project remain applicable to the Project, and no new mitigation measures are required; and 3. determines that, pursuant to 14 CCR § 15162, there is no substantial evidence in the record to demonstrate that one or more of the following have occurred with regard to the Project: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the Project which will require major revisions of the County EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the County EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the County EIR were adopted, shows any of the following: I. The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the County EIR; II. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the County EIR; III. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the applicant declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or IV. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the County EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the applicant declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Docusign Envelope ID: DDC42BBB-1CDA-8623-8208-0F866D2C3168