KIER & WRIGHT (#2027114) - Laserfiche WebLink

Radius Design w illidentifydry uti lityand overhead power line conflicts for each alternative. PG&E relocations are k nown to carry mult i-year lead ti m es, a nd early conflict ident ification is essential to keeping u t ilit y re locat ion off the project's c ri t ical pat h. Radius Design w ill also identify backbone dry utility infrastructure to b e accommodat ed wit hin the rig ht -of-w ay for future developm ent. AR/WS w ill id entify affected parcels. c haracterize t he type of r ig ht aw ay takes required. assess valuat ion implications. and provide a planni n g -level acquisition assessment addressing p ermane nt acquisi ti ons, temporary easem ent s. and parcel access effects across the corridor. Deliverables: Utility. d ra inage. and right -of-w ay exhibit ident ifying key conflicts. constraints. and right -of-w ay n eeds for each a lig nment alternative. accompanied by a memorandum summar iz ing findings and recommendations. TASK g -STAKEHOLDER AND AGENCY COORDINATION LEAD FIRM: K .. W CONTRIBUTING: ALL SUBCONSULTANTS K+W will lead stakeholder and agency coordination as d irected by t he Ci ty. prepari ng meeting materi als and documenting comments and responses at each step. Where specific technical expertise is n eed ed to support a particular stakeh older conve rsa t ion, the re levant su bconsultant wi ll b e b rought in as n eeded. The El C harro corridor involves an unusually broad set of stakeh olders. Key parties anticipated t o requi re coordinatio n in c lude q uarry operat ors regardi ng access and t ruck traffic: Zone 7 Water Agency regarding infrastructure . lake management. and groundwater aquifer protection: t he Cit y o f Livermore as a n adjacent j urisdiction: the Ci ty of Dublin given proximity and potent ial t raffic implications: t he Livermore Amador Va lley Transit Aut h ority regardi ng BRT considerat ions: East Bay Regional Pa rk District given t h e Shadow Cliffs connection at Stanley Boulevard: Caltrans d epending on study area limits: Union Pacific Ra ilroad regarding t he crossing: and privat e landow ners wit h active e nt itlements o r development applicat ions w here alignment decisions could affec t access o r right -of- w ay. Immediate neighborh ood out reach is antici p ated to be addressed t hrough the Ci ty o f Pleasanton's existing public engagement processes. Deliverables: Meeting m aterials. action it e m and decision logs. an d agency and stakeholder coordi nat ion documentat ion. A minimum of three one-hour meetings w ith each key stakeho lder is anticipat ed. w ith t h e appropriate subconsu ltant participating as needed based on t he su bject matter of each meeting. TASK 10 -PREFERRED ALIGNMENT RECOMMENDATION AND FINAL DOCUMENTATION LEAD FIRM: K .. W CONTRIBUTING: TJKM, GREEN DESIGN, AR/WS K+W wi ll recomme n d a p referred p recise roadway alignment based on t he result s of t he alternatives analysis an d Ci t y feedback. synt hesizing t he w ork p roducts from Tasks 1 t hrough g. K+W. in conjunction wit h TJ KIV! and Green Design. w ill prepare d raft and fi na l technica l documentation. exh ib its. typical section s. and presentation materi als for city rev iew. The documentation w ill include a clear an d technica lly defensible narrative t h at ex plains w hy the p refe rred alignment is recommended and w hat t h e city shou ld expect in t h e next p hase of project delivery. Upon selection of t h e preferred alignme nt. K+W will p repare a p lat map and legal description of the area to be reserved for the f uture roa dway, as w e ll as separate plat maps and leg al descript ions for each affected parcel through which the alignment extends. suit able for recordatio n against t he p ropert y as required by t h e RFP. AR/WS wi ll support thi s e ffort by confirming parce l ownership, boundary conditio n s. and any t itle con siderations re levant to the legal d escri p tio ns. Deliverables: Dra ft and fi nal p referred a lignment package in cludi n g conceptual p la n and profi le draw ings. typical sections wit h concept ua l landscape t reatments. design assumptions and constraints summary. o rder- of-magnitude cost est imates. a nd recomm end ed next steps: final prec ise roadway alignment report plat maps and legal descriptions for t h e prefer red alignment corridor and each affected parce l: and presentat ion materi als and editable e lectronic files for Ci ty revi ew. Kier ,. Wright I Page 17 Docusign Envelope ID: 776668AA-84FE-8E4D-81ED-F89B854166B8Docusign Envelope ID: 1E4E4FCF-7AB2-8687-82B4-D0B680FDBFDB